This system description reports on how Kissat’s award-winning techniques were adapted to the full-featured incremental SAT solver CaDiCaL, including clausal congruence closure, clausal equivalence sweeping, and bounded variable addition, to support efficient linear proof production with hints.
This paper revisits previous work on ER, which factors out repeated parts of learned clauses during conflict analysis, and explores how their original strategy benefits from 15 years of improvements in the state-of-the-art solver CaDiCaL, and proposes a new, less intrusive inprocessing approach based on factoring XOR and ITE gates from learned clauses globally.
Florian Pollitt, Zachary Battleman, Mathias Fleury et al.· International Conference on...· 1 citation
The Model Constructing Satisfiability (MCSat) approach has shown strong performance in solving complex SMT problems, in particular in algebraic SMT theories such as non-linear integer and real arithmetic. In this paper we revisit the theory-independent MCSat framework as a proof system to provide a modern perspective that refines the original formulation of MCSat. By closely formalizing the implementation of MCSat within the Yices2 SMT solver, we incorporate design decisions that diverge from those in the seminal MCSat paper and thereby capture the current state-of-the-art in MCSat-based SMT reasoning. We present a general, theory-agnostic rule scheme for MCSat and instantiate it for several theories, including propositional logic, non-linear real arithmetic, and uninterpreted functions. We provide several detailed examples to illustrate the applicability of the presented calculus.
T. Hader, Theo Jauschneg, Daniela Kaufmann et al.· 0 citations
Here it is explained how and why the WhyUnsat approach is now also directly applicable, at no implementation cost, to IPASIR-UP-based constraint programming by Lazy Clause Generation (LCG) as well as to SAT Modulo Theories (SMT).
R. Nieuwenhuis, Albert Oliveras, Enric Rodríguez-carbonell· 0 citations
PalRUP is introduced – an LRUP -based proof format and a bottleneck-free, decentralized parallel checking procedure that only uses the (parallel) file system and is composed of a set of small, sequential trusted components.
Ruben Götz, Michael Dörr, Dominik Schreiber· International Conference on...· 0 citations