Skip to content

Design and application of an AI-enabled adaptive framework for assessing circularity in socio-ecological and technical systems (SETs) within the WEFE nexus

Abstract

(English) Sustainability and circular economy transitions in contemporary socio-environmental systems are increasingly challenged by complexity, uncertainty, and strong interdependencies between natural resources, infrastructures, and governance structures. Traditional sectoral and indicator-based assessment approaches have proven insufficient to capture these interactions, often overlooking systemic trade-offs, emergent behaviors, and context-specific constraints. In response to these limitations, this doctoral thesis develops, applies, and validates integrated, participatory, and adaptive assessment frameworks for sustainability and circularity, grounded in systems thinking and the Water–Energy–Food–Ecosystems (WEFE) Nexus. The thesis is structured as a compendium as follows. The first chapter is the introduction, including the research context of the main concepts, the background and rationale, and the design, starting with the research questions, hypothesis, identification of the research gap, the research lines and objectives. The second chapter, dives into the state of the art of the main concepts, presenting the bibliometric analysis as well as the institutional context and the projects that provided the scene for the applied research. The third chapter is dedicated to the methodology, starting with the global methodology framework and then focusing on the WEFE Nexus and integrated assessment. The fourth chapter, proposes an integrated multi-criteria framework for assessing sustainability and circular economy performance in public water utilities operating in Mediterranean contexts, combining environmental footprints, ecosystem services, governance, and operational performance within a decision-oriented analytical structure. The fifth chapter applies an artificial intelligence (AI)–enabled WEFE Nexus assessment tool to evaluate circular bioeconomy (specifically biochar and agroforestry) highlighting trade-offs, synergies, and context-dependent outcomes under future scenarios in a dynamic way. The sixth chapter consolidates these insights into a transferable methodological framework for participatory, AI-enabled circularity assessment across heterogeneous socio-environmental systems. The seventh chapter is focused on the discussion of the theoretical and the applied research, specifically to proof whether circularity was implemented as a static set of material loops, or if enough evidence is found that circularity was implemented as an emergent system property, resulting from interactions between resource systems, ecosystems, institutions, and stakeholder values in the frame of this thesis. The eighth and final chapter gathers conclusions to measure the degree in which the methodology and its derived applications help integrate multi-criteria decision analysis, participatory processes, artificial intelligence, and digital twin concepts to support transparent, context appropriate and adaptive sustainability assessment. Finally, limitations and future research lines are drawn to set some basic principles for replication and adaptation of the analysis tool in different contexts.   Overall, the thesis aims to contribute in advancing the state of the art in sustainability science by operationalizing the WEFE Nexus through AI-enabled and participatory assessment frameworks, bridging the gap between conceptual integration and practical support for decision-making. The obtained results, demonstrate that systemic, adaptive, and governance-aware approaches are essential for informing transitions towards sustainability and circular economy in complex socio-environmental systems with resource constraints (Català) La sostenibilitat i les transicions de l'economia circular en els sistemes socioambientals contemporanis es troben cada vegada més desafiades per la complexitat, la incertesa i les fortes interdependències entre els recursos naturals, les infraestructures i les estructures de governança. Els enfocaments tradicionals, d'avaluació sectorial basada en indicadors, han demostrat ser insuficients per capturar aquestes interaccions, sovint ignorant les compensacions sistèmiques, els comportaments emergents i les restriccions específiques del context. En resposta a aquestes limitacions, la present tesi doctoral desenvolupa, aplica i valida marcs d'avaluació integrats, participatius i adaptatius per a la sostenibilitat i la circularitat, basats en el pensament de sistemes i el Nexe Aigua-Energia-Alimentació-Ecosistemes. La tesi s'estructura com a compendi de la manera següent. El primer capítol és la introducció, a on es presenta el context de recerca dels principals conceptes, els antecedents i fonaments de la recerca, axí com el disseny, que comença amb les preguntes i hipòtesis de la recerca, la identificació de la bretxa de recerca, així com les línies i objectius. El segon capítol, s’endinsa en l’estat de l’art dels principals conceptes, presentant l’anàlisi bibliomètric a més del contexte institucional i els projectes que han proporcionat l’escenari per la part aplicada de la recerca. El tercer capítol, es dedica a la metodolgia, començant amb el marc metodològic global per posteriorment enfocar-se en el WEFE Nexus i l’avaluació integrada. El quart capítol, proposa un marc multicriteri integrat per avaluar el rendiment de la sostenibilitat i l'economia circular en els serveis públics d'aigua que operen en contextos mediterranis, combinant petjades ambientals, serveis ecosistèmics, governança i rendiment operatiu dins d'una estructura analítica orientada a la presa de decisions. El cinqué capítol, aplica una eina d'avaluació del WEFE Nexus activada per la intel·ligència artificial (IA) a les solucions de bioeconomia circular (específicament al biochar i les pràctiques agroforestales), les quals destaquen les compensacions, les sinergies i els resultats dependents del context i la seva dinàmica en escenaris futurs. El sisè capítol, consolida aquestes idees en un marc metodològic transferible per a l'avaluació de la circularitat participativa i activada per IA mitjançant sistemes socioambientals heterogenis. El capítol setè, es centra en la discussió dels resultats obtinguts a través de la recerca teòrica i aplicada, específicament per demostrar si la circularitat s'ha implementat com un conjunt estàtic de cicles de materials, o si s’ha assolit la seva implementació com una propietat de sistema emergent resultant de les interaccions entre els sistemes de recursos, els ecosistemes, les institucions i els valors dels grups d'interès, dins del marc de la present tesis. El capítol vuitè i últim, recull les conclusions per tal de mesurar el grau en què la metodologia i les seves aplicacions, ajuden a integrar l'anàlisi de decisions multi-criteri, els processos participatius, la intel·ligència artificial i els conceptes bessons digitals per donar suport a una avaluació de sostenibilitat transparent, adequada al context i adaptativa. Finalment, es dibuixen limitacions i futures línies de recerca per establir alguns principis bàsics per a la replicació i adaptació de l'eina d'anàlisi en altres contextes. En general, la tesi pretén contribuir a l'avanç de l'estat de l'art en la ciència de la sostenibilitat mitjançant l'operativitat del WEFE Nexus a través de marcs d'avaluació participatius i habilitats per la IA, reduint la bretxa entre la integració conceptual i el suport pràctic a la pressa de decisións. (Español) La sostenibilidad y las transiciones de la economía circular en los sistemas socioambientales contemporáneos, encuentran cada vez más desafíos a causa de la complejidad, la incertidumbre y las fuertes interdependencias entre los recursos naturales, las infraestructuras y las estructuras de gobernanza. Los enfoques tradicionales, de evaluación sectorial basada en indicadores, han demostrado ser insuficientes para capturar estas interacciones, a menudo ignorando las compensaciones sistémicas, los comportamientos emergentes y las restricciones específicas del contexto. En respuesta a estas limitaciones, la presente tesis doctoral desarrolla, aplica y valida marcos de evaluación integrados, participativos y adaptativos para la sostenibilidad y la circularidad, basados en el pensamiento sistémico y el Nexo Agua-Energía-Alimentación-Ecosistemas. La tesis se estructura como un compendio de la manera siguiente. El primer capítulo es la introducción, donde se presenta el contexto de investigación de los principales conceptos, los antecedentes y fundamentos, así como el diseño de la investigación, comenzando por las preguntas e hipótesis, la identificación de la brecha de investigación, así como las líneas y objetivos. El segundo capítulo, profundiza en el estado del arte de los principales conceptos, presentando el análisis biliométrico y el contexto institucional y proyectos que han proposcionado el escenario para la parte aplicada de la investigación. El tercer capítulo, se dedica a la metodología, empezando por el marco metodológico global para enfocarse posteriormente en el WEFE Nexus y la evaluación integrada. El cuarto capítulo, propone un marco multicriterio integrado para evaluar el rendimiento de la sostenibilidad y la economía circular en los servicios públicos de agua que operan en contextos mediterráneos, combinando huellas ambientales, servicios ecosistémicos, gobernanza y rendimiento operativo dentro de una estructura analítica orientada a la toma de decisiones. El quinto capítulo, aplica una herramienta de evaluación del WEFE Nexus activada por la inteligencia artificial (IA) a las soluciones de bioeconomia circular (específicamente, al biochar y las prácticas agroforestales), las cuales destacan las compensaciones, las sinergias y los resultados dependientes del contexto y su dinámica en escenarios futuros. El sexto capítulo, consolida estas ideas en un marco metodológico transferible para la evaluación de la circularidad participativa y activada por IA mediante sistemas socioambientales heterogéneo

View source

Similar papers

Review Open access Jul 2026

Assessing Impact Evaluation Methods: A Comparative Analysis and Proposal for an Integrated and Transformative Framework

The growing complexity of public policies and socio-ecological transitions demands evaluation tools that integrate environmental, economic, and social dimensions across multiple governance contexts. However, the main evaluation impact methods are fragmented and sector-specific, limiting their ability to capture cross-scale interdependencies and sustainability of trade-offs. While existing reviews address methods in isolation, no updated systematic framework is built upon joint epistemological and participatory dimensions, proposing an integrated and transformative framework. Through a common analytical framework—encompassing the type of impact assessed, territorial scale, methodological approach, degree of stakeholder participation, and operational complexity—the paper presents a systematic comparative review of eleven widely used evaluation methods, covering the environmental, economic, social, and multidimensional dimensions. These methods are selected through screening of peer-reviewed literature published between 2022 and 2025 using an AI-assisted text-mining protocol to support keyword extraction, methodological classification, and manual validation. Its focus is on the analysis and critique of their characteristics, complexity, and epistemological limitations, particularly focusing on measurability and participation. The comparative analysis reveals a structural epistemological gap between qualitative bottom-up perspectives and quantitative, top-down approaches, as well as structural fragmentation across evaluative dimensions. They also draw attention to the approaches’ inadequate ability to manage non-linear dynamics, uncertainty, and transformative scenarios, which affects the legitimacy, comparability, and general efficacy of decision-making processes. Building on these, the paper advances a paradigmatic shift toward three systemic integrated principles: (i) systemic evaluation grounded in methodological and epistemological integration; (ii) transformative evaluation oriented toward collective learning and the redefinition of development trajectories; and (iii) co-produced evaluation based on the active engagement of territorial actors.

Valentina Cattivelli, Noemi Biancone, F. Ferri et al. · 0 citations
Open access 2026

Innovation in Design for Sustainability

The intensification of ecological crises, resource scarcity, and social inequalities compels design to fundamentally redefine its role, methods, and criteria for innovation. This article argues that innovation in design can no longer be understood as the mere creation of new artifacts, but rather as the capacity to reconfigure systems of production, consumption, and disposal. Based on the widely recognized premise that the majority of the environmental impacts of products and services are determined during the design phase, the designer is repositioned as a strategic agent in the transition toward sustainable socio-economic models.Within this context, the article examines the synergistic articulation of four complementary approaches: Ecodesign, as an analytical foundation oriented toward life-cycle thinking; Circular Design, focused on redefining business models and material flows; Biodesign, which incorporates biological principles and processes; and Human-Centered Design (HCD), responsible for ensuring social, cultural, and ethical relevance. It is argued that the transdisciplinary integration of these approaches constitutes an emerging paradigm of systemic innovation in design, in which success is assessed according to interdependent environmental, social, and economic criteria, thereby demanding new professional competencies and expanded forms of collaboration.

C. Carreto, R. Carreto · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Circular Economy as a Driver of Ecological Transition and Sustainable Development: The RE-MED Project in Tunisia

This article interrogates the potential of the circular economy as a structuring paradigm for ecological transition and sustainable development in Tunisia, with particular emphasis on the management of construction and demolition waste (CDW). Situating the analysis within critiques of the dominant linear economic model, it elucidates how the circular reconfiguration of material flows may contribute to reducing environmental externalities, preserving natural capital, and stimulating territorially embedded forms of green employment. The study adopts a multidimensional and interdisciplinary methodological framework, combining a critical review of academic literature, the analysis of institutional and policy reports, qualitative interviews with key public and private stakeholders, and an in- depth case study of the RE-MED project, implemented notably in the Greater Tunis region. The study's results demonstrate the development of novel socio-technical configurations for reclaiming and recycling construction and demolition waste (CDW). Concurrently, they underscore how deeply entrenched institutional inertia, regulatory deficiencies, economic hurdles, and socio-cultural pushback continue to obstruct the widespread systemic adoption of circular economy models. The article concludes by advancing a set of policy-relevant recommendations aimed at reinforcing governancearchitectures, consolidating recycling value chains, and fostering the societal embedding of circular economy principles within the Tunisian context.

M. Ellouze · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Operationalizing Knowledge Co-production: The Hybrid Epistemic Adaptive Resilience (HEAR) Framework and Methodological Lessons from Malawi

Indigenous Knowledge Systems (IKS) and real-time digital technologies offer complementary resources for strengthening climate resilience in smallholder agriculture, yet their integration remains methodologically difficult. This paper develops the Hybrid Epistemic Adaptive Resilience (HEAR) framework to address the epistemic, institutional, and technical tensions that arise when Complex Adaptive Systems theory and Participatory Action Research are applied in stratified agricultural extension settings. The framework is grounded in a longitudinal, convergent-parallel mixed-methods case study being conducted across Nsanje, Dedza, and Karonga districts in Malawi from September 2024 to June 2026. HEAR organises knowledge co-production through four linked layers: technological and indigenous data inputs, a Translation Engine, adaptive feedback loops, and socio-ecological outcomes. The Translation Engine comprises knowledge extraction, semantic mapping, evidence weighting, and recommendation generation. It is designed to combine sensor, satellite, meteorological, and crop-modelling data with locally validated phenological, edaphic, celestial, meteorological, ethno-pedological, and ethno-botanical knowledge. The framework also incorporates power-sensitive facilitation, multimodal advisory delivery, longitudinal adoption monitoring, yield-stability assessment, farmer-satisfaction measures, and an Epistemic Justice Index. By specifying measurable constructs, testable pathways, and safeguards for community authority and data governance, HEAR provides a structured methodology for examining whether hybrid advisories can become scientifically credible, culturally legitimate, accessible, and responsive to local agricultural conditions.

Felix Stenfield Khechi, T. Manda, G. Kunyenje · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

A cybernetic framework for transformative food system change: sustainable landscape management in West and Central Africa

The multiple socio-ecological dimensions of sustainable landscape management, along with potential cross-boundary effects and co-evolving societal conditions, require research evaluation approaches that consider complex projects as viable organizational systems rather than a collection of stand-alone workstreams. This study analyses the co-design phase of the Transforming Agri-Food Systems in West and Central Africa (TAFS-WCA) Initiative by applying the Viable System Model (VSM) as a cybernetic framework for organizational analysis. Using the Initiative’s proposal and Theory of Change as the reference structure, the analysis identifies three nested organizational levels: Initiative, Work Package and Output, and summarizes how the five VSM functions at each level interact to shape operational processes, coordination mechanisms, strategic foresight and governance. Moreover, an adapted Rummler-Brache Nine Box Model is applied to the VSM diagnosis to support streamlined examination of performance expectations, process design, and capability requirements across the nested levels. This dual framing supports a structured and systemic interrogation of the Initiative’s organizational design. It highlights how the Monitoring, Evaluation, Learning and Impact Assessment (MELIA) functions may act as potential feedback pathways linking operational performance (S1) with managerial oversight (S2, S3, S3*) and strategic adaptation (S4, S5). The cybernetic interpretation, therefore, positions MELIA as a visible mechanism through which reflective and accountability processes can filter, strengthen and redirect information flows across recursive levels. The analysis then focuses on Work Package (WP) 3, which synthesizes evidence from multiple WPs to develop sustainable landscape management plans and a Water Decision Support System. By matching WP3’s expected deliverables with the outputs and Activities from other WPs and interrogating these relationships through the VSM, the analysis clarifies how interdependencies across the nested organizational levels may influence WP3’s ability to mobilize evidence. This structured approach offers a clearer understanding of how WP3’s integrative role may contribute to system (Initiative)-wide adaptive capacity. This study provides a reproducible methodology for examining, during the co-design phase, how governance, coordination and performance dynamics can be aligned within sustainability initiatives operating under complex and evolving conditions.

N. Sobratee-Fajurally, O. Cofie, R. Slotow et al. · 0 citations
Jul 2026

The green building paradox: challenges to sustainability in the built environment

The purpose of this study is to examine the complex challenges to sustainability in the built environment and uncover their interlinked causal relationships. This study applies grey influence network analysis (GINA) and its novel interpretative extension (iGINA) to model, quantify and prioritise the interrelationships among barriers using expert judgements. The iGINA analysis revealed misaligned stakeholder incentives as the most influential barrier, followed by high initial cost, while technological readiness ranked lowest, challenging tech-centric assumptions. Expert-driven data limits generalisability, but advances grey systems theory for uncertain, large-scale networks. This study prioritises realigning incentives via performance-based contracts, green bonds, life cycle costing and regulatory sandboxes − breaking economic barriers for scalable green adoption. iGINA uncovers feedback loops and leverage points overlooked by traditional methods, offering a blueprint for managers, policymakers and researchers.

Drisya Murali, S. M., R. Raman · 0 citations