Sep 2026· Digital Hate Review· Vol 1· 0 citations· 60 references
TL;DR
This work proposes a novel computational methodology and app, the Hate Mitigation App (HMApp), that discovers emerging coded or non-coded hate speech terminology on social media using a set of researcher-selected anchor hate terms to identify new terminology associated with a specific type of hatred.
Abstract
The growth of social media has enabled unprecedented global connectivity and access to information, but social media platforms have also become channels for hate speech that targets individuals and groups based on identity and protected characteristics. While advances in machine learning and natural language processing have improved hate speech detection, these models are static and cannot be updated easily in an environment where terminology evolves continuously. Although manual inspection can identify emerging terminology, the volume of posts often proves prohibitive. We propose a novel computational methodology and app, the Hate Mitigation App (HMApp), that discovers emerging coded or non-coded hate speech terminology on social media. Specifically, the approach uses a set of researcher-selected anchor hate terms to identify new terminology associated with a specific type of hatred, such as antisemitism. We use this approach with five different types of hatred: antisemitism, anti-Black hatred, Islamophobia, anti-Asian hatred, and anti-LGBTQ+ hatred. Using two categories of evaluation metrics—one comparing discovered terms against existing lexicons and another validating them through online searches—we find that the approach identifies both established and novel terminology. Our findings underscore the potential of computational approaches to augment manual detection efforts and keep pace with the rapidly evolving nature of online hate speech. Though related to both, our approach is neither Hate Speech Detection nor Automated Terminology Extraction, which are often construed as classification tasks. Our method, in contrast, uses unsupervised learning, thus engaging in a discovery rather than a classification task, yielding ramifications for both our design and testing methodologies.
The results indicate that distinguishing between hate speech and dehumanizing language remains challenging, particularly when both forms occur within the same comment, and demonstrate that appropriate text normalization and selecting an effective feature size can improve classification performance.
Shahid Nasiri, Nesar Ahmad Wasi· Journal of nature and scienc...· 0 citations
The presented results highlight the complexity and diversity of hate speech in Serbian online communication, demonstrating a high detection accuracy of 86.7% achieved with the LLaMA 3 model, followed by Qwen3 (82%) for the two-stage sentence-level pipeline and Qwen3 (82%) for the two-stage sentence-level pipeline.
Matija Dodović, Janko Tufegdžić, Dražen D. Drašković· IEEE Access· 0 citations
Social media platforms are key spaces for sharing opinions, experiences, and daily events. However, the rapid rise in hate speech, especially implicit hate, has become a significant concern. Implicit hate is subtle, context-dependent, and more difficult to detect than explicit hate. Despite the growing body of work on...
Rajkumar Panchal, Megha Jonnalagedda· International Journal of Adv...· 0 citations
The use of social media in Nigeria for communication, information access, and public discussion
cannot be overemphasized. However, some individuals and organizations exploit it negatively,
spreading hate speech, misinformation, and toxic content. Such abusive online behavior has led to
politically, socially, and eth...
Akpos Didi Enai· International Journal of Com...· 0 citations
Comparing the performance of two Indonesian language models, IndoBERT and Cendol, for hate speech detection on the X platform, suggests that each model exhibits distinct strengths depending on language characteristics and contextual usage.