Skip to content
Preprint

Overcoming Shortcut Learning in Graph Neural Networks through Active Explanation Guidance

Aug 2026 · 0 citations · 29 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

This work introduces XIGL, an architecture-agnostic human-in-the-loop strategy for removing shortcuts from GNNs, and develops an active learning strategy for prioritizing explanations that are more likely to display shortcut behavior, lowering annotation and cognitive costs.

Abstract

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) can solve prediction tasks by unintentionally exploiting shortcuts---that is, edges, nodes, and features that correlate with but are not causal for the prediction---which compromise their reliability in out-of-distribution tasks. We introduce XIGL, an architecture-agnostic human-in-the-loop strategy for removing such shortcuts from GNNs. Our key insight is twofold. On the one hand, reliance on shortcuts can be detected by inspecting GNN explanations. On the other hand, once made aware of such shortcuts, sufficiently expert users can provide tailored corrective feedback, which helps deconfound the model. XIGL supports any query strategy; however, since corrective feedback can be expensive to acquire, we develop an active learning strategy for prioritizing explanations that are more likely to display shortcut behavior, lowering annotation and cognitive costs. We showcase the effectiveness of XIGL, including both existing and proposed explanation-based strategies, on several GNN architectures. Our implementation is available online.

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Aug 2026

Graph-Guided Selective Unlearning for Language Models: Controlling Support Routes Beyond Forget Seeds

Enterprises fine-tune language models on proprietary data that may later require removal due to privacy, contractual, or compliance obligations. Selective unlearning removes requested knowledge while preserving model utility, offering a practical alternative to full retraining, but existing methods treat the explicitly identified forget examples as the complete deletion scope. This is insufficient when target knowledge remains recoverable through paraphrases, aliases, or neighboring training examples. We propose GRAPHSU, a graph-guided controller that expands the deletion scope beyond forget seeds by constructing a weighted support-route graph, propagating deletion pressure through it, and applying graded forgetting strengths to high-risk neighbors. On the Task of Fictitious Unlearning (TOFU), a synthetic author-profile question-answering benchmark, and PISTOL, a structural-unlearning benchmark built around interconnected factual samples, with GPT-2 Medium and Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct, GRAPHSU achieves the lowest utility-feasible soft leakage across all deletion settings, reducing leakage by up to 49.5 percentage points over a matched seed-only baseline, demonstrating that effective enterprise unlearning requires controlling support routes, not just forget seeds.

Waqas Khan, Tabinda Sarwar, Jingyue Cong et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Why Does Graph Learning Fail to Fully Benefit from a Text Teacher?

Graph neural networks (GNNs) are widely used to represent complex interactions and relationships among entities. We investigate a multimodal model that combines two complementary ideas: a self-supervised method that enables a GNN encoder pretrained on one dataset to operate directly on another dataset with a different node-feature dimensionality, without rebuilding the model or realigning the data; and an alternating optimization method that updates a language-model module in an E-step and a GNN module in an M-step, rather than jointly training a large language model and a GNN end to end on a large graph. Despite expectations, the combined model did not sufficiently improve predictive performance. We identify six factors: (1) an external anchor in the E-step has a strength-safety trade-off: a weak anchor has little effect, whereas an overly strong anchor can damage the graph representation; (2) the knowledge of the E-step teacher is not injected directly into the GCN embedding Z; (3) the representation space constructed in the M-step is not optimized for the same objective as the E-step teacher space, resulting in a compromise representation for target classification; (4) GCN propagation averages a node's own textual information with information from its neighbors; (5) cosine alignment does not guarantee axes that are discriminative for classification, so stronger geometric alignment with the E-step text anchor need not sufficiently improve the target decision boundary or classification performance; and (6) the force that preserves the source-side self-supervised geometry in the M-step conflicts with the force that moves the representation toward the E-step teacher. We support these observations through a staged set of experiments that varies the influence of the E-step.

Fumiaki Kimino, Ryoma Sato Sokendai, National Institute of Informatics · 0 citations
Book Open access Aug 2026

Out-of-Distribution Robust Explainer for Graph Neural Networks

Experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets show that ORExplainer consistently provides more robust explanations across diverse node-level OOD settings, outperforming existing baselines.

Geonhee Han, Heesoo Jung, Hyunju Kang et al. · 0 citations

Taking lessons from history: Memory Augmented Self Distillation for graph neural networks

This study introduces a novel memory-augmented self-learning framework that extracts and provides diverse learning sources for adaptive knowledge distillation from the student model itself, resulting in a 2.5-6% increase in accuracy across various benchmark datasets compared to current GNN training and self-distillation methods.

Saurabh Sharma, Souvik Chowdhury, Joydeep Chandra · 0 citations
Preprint Jul 2026

Towards Faithful Graph Explanations with Synergistic Edge Effects via Granular Balls

Instance-level explanations aim to reveal the rationale behind a model's decisions for a specific graph. Previous methods explain graph neural networks (GNNs) by selecting important edges to induce subgraphs, where edge importance is assessed by perturbing each edge and observing changes in the model predictions. However, they often neglect the synergistic effects among edges, which are crucial for accurately characterizing edge importance. To address this issue, we propose SeeExplainer, a parameter-free explainer to interpret GNNs. Specifically, we first introduce a granular-ball graph refinement mechanism that decomposes a graph into several disjoint granular-balls with no fixed size, and utilize them as nodes to construct a structural graph. This process can better capture the synergistic effects among edges. Then, we perturb nodes and edges in the structural graph to generate explanatory subgraphs based on their respective contributions. Experiments on several graph classification datasets of different networks show that SeeExplainer outperforms state-of-the-art baselines.

Jiancu Chen, Shuyin Xia, Guan Wang et al. · 0 citations