Skip to content
Review Open access

Cognitive-motor coupling in beach volleyball: a systematic review of attention, anticipation, decision-making, and psychological-affective correlates of performance

Sep 2026 · JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia) · 0 citations · 44 references

Abstract

Beach volleyball is a physically demanding dyadic Olympic sport in which performance depends on interacting physical, technical, perceptual-cognitive, and psychological factors. This systematic review synthesised evidence on visual attention, anticipation, decision-making, cognitive load, and psychological-affective states in beach volleyball. Following PRISMA 2020 guidance, Scopus, PubMed, and ScienceDirect were searched during the review period; the database search reported in the manuscript yielded 982 records, of which 16 duplicates were removed and 966 were screened. Sixty-four reports were sought for full-text assessment, 59 were assessed for eligibility, and 22 studies met the prespecified inclusion criteria and entered the qualitative synthesis. Eligibility was structured using PICOS: beach volleyball participants or expertise comparators; perceptual-cognitive and/or psychological-affective constructs; performance- or expertise-related outcomes; and empirical peer-reviewed designs. Study quality was appraised with a transparent four-domain FICO rubric (Focus, Information, Context, Outcome), with scores of 7–8 classified as high quality and 5–6 as moderate; 19 of 22 studies were rated high quality and the median score was 7/8. The synthesis identified three interconnected themes: action-coupled attention and anticipation, cue- and heuristic-based decision-making under cognitive load, and psychological-affective regulation. Explicit participant samples ranged from 1 to 82 in studies reporting participant counts, while some studies used match-level datasets. Evidence was geographically concentrated: 8 studies were attributed to Germany and 8 to Brazil, with 3 from Estonia, 2 from Switzerland, and 1 from the Netherlands. The heterogeneity of designs and outcomes precluded quantitative meta-analysis. Overall, the evidence supports a cognitive-motor model in which perceptual expertise, decision processes, mental fatigue, and affective states jointly shape performance.

Read PDF

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.