This paper provides the foundations of AI and risks of GenAI, followed by a Use Case example of data management from a sensor edge node through actionable intelligence describing AI, and a data science strategy underpinning AI for enhancing trusted AI-agentic teaming.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is a field where the masses offer declarations about novel advancements to machine intelligence and the everyday person feels like an AI “expert” in Generative AI (GenAI), such as ChatGPT and DALL-E. While 80+ years of research has led to the potential for GenAI to create new, “original” content, the public ought to understand that GenAI’s abilities are predicated on processing massive datasets. These datasets have many potential risks, including overtraining or novel datasets, foundational data science and metadata to AI models to cause incorrect decisions, bypass security, or extract sensitive information. Effective, trusted teaming with AI-agentic teams remains a critical research and development objective. Further, AI effectiveness becomes irrelevant if a human does not understand or trust the AI. This paper provides the foundations of AI and risks of GenAI, followed by a Use Case example of data management from a sensor edge node through actionable intelligence describing AI. This Use Case will walk through a data science strategy underpinning AI for enhancing trusted AI-agentic teaming, outlining the scientific research, challenges, and risks that can occur at each step that can directly impact the trusted relationship.
XAI provides a powerful framework for responsible AI development, challenges such as the performance-interpretability trade-off, lack of standardized evaluation metrics, and potential for human misinterpretation remain areas of active research.
P. Pradhan, Amol Rajmane, C. patil· Journal of image processing...· 0 citations
A methodology is advanced to embed explainability in the AI decision-making process, starting from data preprocessing to generating explanations and human evaluation, and the results highlight the potential of explainability to enhance human comprehension and foster responsible use of AI systems in high-stakes decision...
Mahabala H. N.· International Journal of Mod...· 0 citations
The Ordinal-W framework, as presented herein has been shown to facilitate conversations about the very complicated topic of AI risk management and mitigation and it allows users of all levels of technical expertise to understand risks associated with AI that may otherwise have gone unnoticed.
A baseline review of the selected papers volume of the inaugural International Conference on Formal Methods and Foundations of Artificial Intelligence (FMF-AI 2025), published as Annales Mathematicae et Informaticae, introduces simple baseline metrics that can be recomputed in future FMF-AI editions to observe structur...
Gábor Kusper· Annales Mathematicae et Info...· 0 citations
A thorough and stepwise analysis of how XAI was created in current decision systems indicates that explainable models, in addition to increasing interpretability, can also help to improve debugging, bias detection and ethical AI deployment.
Meena Krishnan· International Journal of Mod...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.