Aug 2026· Research technology management· Vol 69, pp. 14 - 28· 0 citations· 51 references
Abstract
Abstract OVERVIEW: The COVID-19 pandemic forced organizations worldwide to show short-term organizational resilience by shifting rapidly to remote work to ensure business continuity and often survival. Various factors—including work content, process design, technology literacy, and culture—shaped how smoothly each organization navigated this transition. Over time, most organizations found a new equilibrium between remote and on-site work arrangements. These adaptation processes exemplify long-term organizational resilience. To explore these forms of resilience in innovation-focused organizations, we conducted an 18-month longitudinal study of four R&D units within large global industrial firms. The data reveal that short-term resilience can differ significantly from long-term resilience within organizations, and that long-term resilience can vary in both outcome and process across organizations. The process-oriented lens allows for identifying different resilience pathways. This divergence can be attributed to the organizations’ cultures. Deeply ingrained cultural norms shape organizational narratives, enabling some crisis responses but constraining others, as such norms cannot be easily altered once a crisis hits. For practitioners, the most appropriate time to build organizational resilience is long before a crisis strikes. PRACTITIONER TAKEAWAYS Recognize that short-term and long-term resilience responses look very different. For short-term resilience (during a crisis) to be effective, leaders must understand which resilience responses align with their organization’s culture and which do not. Building long-term resilience capabilities (for the next crisis) requires establishing the appropriate organizational culture.
This article examines the unintended consequences of organizational resilience. While resilience is commonly associated with adaptability and long-term survival, the study argues that resilience can become misaligned and reinforce continuity even when strategic transformation is necessary. The article identifies fi...
James Welch· Development and Learning in...· 0 citations
Organizations are constantly in flux, and the world faces crises ranging from natural disasters and pandemics to wars and economic recessions. These volatile times call for resilience. We examine employees’ resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic through the Communication Theory of Resilience (CTR). Drawing on open-end...
R. Jämsen, W. van Zoonen, Anu E. Sivunen· International Journal of Bus...· 0 citations
This qualitative case study examines how a federal field detachment sustained operational continuity during the initial implementation of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) workforce reforms. Centered on the loss of a clearance-restricted Security Officer, the study draws on interviews, surveys, and organiz...
Justin P. Johnson, G. Lockhart, Erick Yokomizo et al.· Review of Public Personnel A...· 0 citations
This review paper synthesizes empirical and theoretical research on organizational resilience in the construction sector across individual, team, project, firm, supply chain, and institutional levels, focusing on the historical and contemporary literature published between 2012 and 2026. Systematic shocks such as econo...
Z. Sapeciay, Mohd. Zulakhmar Zakiyudin· International journal of res...· 0 citations