Skip to content
Log in
Review Open access

The AI Implementation Gap: Policy–Audit Misalignment in the UAE and Egypt

John Joshua C. Rañeses Dr. Ain Bemisal Alavi Rafia Arshiya Subhani
Jul 2026 · Journal of Business Insight and Innovation · Vol 5, pp. 151-183 · 0 citations · 62 references

TL;DR

The authors conclude that governance and transparency issues, regional disparities in implementation, and algorithmic complexity contribute to the difficulties in auditor practices in adopting AI tools.

Abstract

Following the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board’s (IAASB) findings, artificial intelligence (AI) developments over human governance in the February 2026 Technology Quality Management roundtables outcome statement, this study aims to disclose the disconnect between the policy and practice of external audit functions in AI adoption. The research employs a qualitative multi-method design that compares the narratives of Big Four organizations’ transparency reports and audit practitioners in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Egypt. The study’s context was determined by the identified gaps in prior empirical research on the differences between the attitudes of corporate management and auditors towards AI usage in external audits. The lead research question focuses on the distinctions in Big Four strategies and individual auditors’ practices in AI applications. The findings are based on content analysis of the narrative of Big Four organizations’ 2021–2025 transparency reports and thematic analysis (TA) of the semi-structured interviews with the auditors in the UAE and Egypt in 2026. The study discovers that auditor practices are currently disconnected from the strategic level propositions. While corporate reports depict a vision in which AI is regarded as a normal component of audit processes, auditors’ experiences suggest it is limited and token adoption in practice. The authors conclude that governance and transparency issues, regional disparities in implementation, and algorithmic complexity contribute to the difficulties in auditor practices in adopting AI tools. These challenges drive the need to establish policy-practice configurations for the effective implementation of audit technologies based on AI. Akpughe, W. O., & Raphael, A. (2026). The Implementation Gap in Emerging Economies: a Theoretical Analysis of Policy Disconnects. Journal of Economics and Trade, 11(1), 286–301. https://doi.org/10.56557/jet/2026/v11i110372 Albous, M. R., Al-Jayyousi, O. R., & Stephens, M. (2025). AI Governance in the GCC States: a Comparative Analysis of National AI Strategies. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 82, 2389–2422. https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.1.17619 Alkhoudi, S., Shaer, S., & Salem, F. (2025). Bridging the AI Divide: Inclusive Governance, Innovation & Competitiveness in the MENA Region. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5687803 Alyani, N. (2018). Diversification and Specialisation in the Gulf’s Digitised Creative Sectors. In A. Mishrif & Y. Al Balushi (Eds.), Economic Diversification in the Gulf Region, Volume II: Comparing Global Challenges (pp. 113–143). Palgrave Macmillan. Andersen Egypt. (2025). English Translation of Law No. 151 of 2020. Andersen.com. https://eg.andersen.com/translation-law-151-2020/ Badawy, W. (2025). The ethical use and development of artificial intelligence (AI) strategy in Egypt: identifying gaps and recommendations. AI and Ethics, 5(4), 3579–3591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681025007291 Baldwin, A. A., Brown, C. E., & Trinkle, B. S. (2006). Opportunities for artificial intelligence development in the accounting domain: the case for auditing. Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, 14(3), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1002/isaf.277 Bandi, A., Kongari, B., Naguru, R., Pasnoor, S., & Vilipala, S. V. (2025). The rise of agentic AI: A review of definitions, frameworks, architectures, applications, evaluation metrics, and challenges. Future Internet, 17, 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi17090404 Bekhet, A. K., & Zauszniewski, J. A. (2012). Methodological Triangulation: an Approach to Understanding Data. Nurse Researcher, 20(2), 40–43. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr2012.11.20.2.40.c9442 Birhane, A., Steed, R., Ojewale, V., Vecchione, B., & Raji, I. D. (2024). AI auditing: The Broken Bus on the Road to AI Accountability. In arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.14462 Bohni Nielsen, S., Mazzeo Rinaldi, F., & Petersson, G. J. (2024). Evaluation in the Era of Artificial Intelligence. Artificial Intelligence and Evaluation, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.4324/97810035124931 Bose, S., Dey, S. K., & Bhattacharjee, S. (2022). Big Data, Data Analytics and Artificial Intelligence in Accounting: an Overview. In S. Akter & S. F. Wamba (Eds.), Handbook of Big Data Methods (pp. 1–34). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4061311 Bromley, P., & Powell, W. W. (2012). From Smoke and Mirrors to Walking the Talk: Decoupling in the Contemporary World. Academy of Management Annals, 6(1), 483–530. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2012.684462 Bruno, M., & Skoglund, K. (2024). Analyzing the Themes of Artificial Intelligence as Framed by the Big Four Accounting firms: a Document Analysis [Master’s Thesis]. https://gupea.ub.gu.se/items/0272ab76-1383-4488-91cf-f68a3e09fd7e Burrell, J. (2016). How the Machine “thinks”: Understanding Opacity in Machine Learning Algorithms. Big Data & Society, 3(1), 2053951715622512. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715622512 Cave, S., & Dihal, K. (2023). Imagining AI: How the World Sees Intelligent Machines. Oxford University Press. https://books.google.ae/books?id=fA28EAAAQBAJ Chowdhury, M.F. (2014). Interpretivism in Aiding Our Understanding of the Contemporary Social World. Open Journal of Philosophy, [online] 4(3), pp.432–438. doi:10.4236/ojpp.2014.43047. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative Inquiry & Research design: Choosing among Five Approaches (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. DeAngelo, L. E. (1981). Auditor Size and Audit Quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(3), 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/01654101(81)900021 DeFond, M., & Zhang, J. (2014). A Review of Archival Auditing Research. 2013 Conference Issue, 58(2), 275–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2014.09.002 Deloitte. (2022). 2021 Transparency Report. In Deloitte. https://www.deloitte.com/content/dam/assets-zone2/ce/en/docs/about/2024/bulgaria/TR_Deloitte_AU_2021_ENG.pdf Deloitte. (2023). 2022 Transparency Report. In Deloitte. https://www.deloitte.com/content/dam/assets-zone2/ce/en/docs/about/2024/bulgaria/TR_Deloitte_AU_2022_ENG.pdf Deloitte. (2024). 2023 Transparency Report. In Deloitte. https://www.deloitte.com/content/dam/assets-zone2/ce/en/docs/about/2024/bulgaria/TR_Deloitte_AU_2023_ENG.pdf Deloitte. (2025a). 2024 Transparency Report. In Deloitte. https://www.deloitte.com/content/dam/assets-zone2/ce/en/docs/about/2025/bulgaria/tr-rep-deloitte-audit-2024-en.pdf Deloitte. (2025b). UAE Audit Transparency Report 2025. In Deloitte. https://www.deloitte.com/content/dam/assets-zone2/middle-east/en/docs/services/audit-assurance/2025/UAE_Audit_Transparency_Report_2025.pdf Detzen, D., & Gold, A. (2021). The Different Shades of Audit quality: a Review of the Academic Literature. Maandblad Voor Accountancy En Bedrijfseconomie, 95(1/2), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.5117/mab.95.60608 DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. JSTOR. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101 Ernst & Young [EY]. (2021). Transparency Report 2021. In EY. https://www.ey.com/content/dam/ey-unified-site/ey-com/en-om/services/assurance/documents/ey-om-transparency-report-10-2021.pdf Ernst & Young [EY]. (2022). Transparency Report 2022. In EY. https://www.ey.com/content/dam/ey-unified-site/ey-com/en-om/services/assurance/documents/ey-om-transparency-report-10-2022.pdf Ernst & Young [EY]. (2023). Transparency Report 2023. In EY. https://www.ey.com/content/dam/ey-unified-site/ey-com/en-om/services/assurance/documents/ey-om-transparency-report-10-2023.pdf Ernst & Young [EY]. (2024). Transparency Report 2024. In EY. https://www.ey.com/content/dam/ey-unified-site/ey-com/en-om/services/assurance/documents/ey-om-transparency-report-10-2024.pdf Ernst & Young [EY]. (2025). Transparency Report 2025. In EY. https://www.ey.com/content/dam/ey-unified-site/ey-com/en-ae/services/assurance/documents/ey-transparency-report-october-2025.pdf Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (General Data Protection Regulation), (2016). http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj Finch, W. W., & Butt, M. (2025). Gaps in AI-Compliant Complementary Governance Frameworks’ Suitability (for Low-Capacity Actors), and Structural Asymmetries (in the Compliance Ecosystem)—A Systematic Review. Journal of Cybersecurity and Privacy, 5(4), 101. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcp5040101 Han, H., Shiwakoti , R. K., Jarvis, R., Mordi, C., & Botchie, D. (2023). Accounting and auditing with blockchain technology and artificial Intelligence: A literature review. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 48, 100598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2022.100598 Hassan, L., ElZeftawy, M., & Mahmoud, A. (2025). Datacenters in the Desert: Feasibility and Sustainability of LLM Inference in the Middle East. ArXiv Preprint. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2511.17683 Herman, L. (2019). Neither takers nor makers: The Big-4 auditing firms as regulatory intermediaries. Accounting History, 25, 3. https://doi.org/10.1177/1032373219875219 Hosseini, S., & Seilani, H. (2025). The Role of Agentic AI in Shaping a Smart future: a Systematic Review. Array, 26, 100399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.array.2025.100399 Huda, S. N. (2022). Institutional Isomorphism. In A. Farazmand (Ed.), Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance (pp. 6759–6765). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/9783030662523_3932 International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board [IAASB]. (2026). Technology Quality Management Roundtables: Outcomes and Next Steps. International Federation of Accountants (IFAC). https://www.iaasb.org/publications/technology-quality-management-roundtables-outcomes-and-next-steps International Monetary Fund [IMF]. (2025, April 22). World Economic Outlook Database - Groups and Aggregates Information. IMF. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/weo-database/2025/april/groups-and-aggregates

DOI Semantic Scholar
Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Aug 2026

From sceptics to enthusiasts: how public auditors confront the AI era

This study aims to examine auditors' readiness and attitudinal profiles toward for implementing artificial intelligence (AI) in public sector external auditing, comparing professionals working in institutions affiliated with the European Organisation of Supreme Audit Institutions (EUROSAI) and the European Organisation of Regional Audit Institutions (EURORAI). Using survey data from 557 external public auditors, the study combines comparative tests, k-means clustering to identify readiness profiles, and multi-group partial least squares structural equation modeling to assess whether the determinants of willingness to implement AI differ across the two institutional settings. The results suggest an early-stage adoption pattern in which auditors perceive strong AI benefits – particularly in automation, data analysis, and text processing – yet willingness to implement AI remains moderate. This gap is consistent with an audit context where adoption requires not only expected gains but also confidence in explainability and evidential traceability, alongside sufficient organisational support. The comparison between EUROSAI and EURORAI indicates selective rather than pervasive differences: willingness is more closely linked to enabling conditions in EURORAI, while effort-related perceptions play a more visible role in EUROSAI. Additionally, three readiness profiles (sceptical, moderate and enthusiastic) highlight substantial internal heterogeneity. The study brings public audit institutions into the public management debate on AI-enabled digital transformation by integrating auditor heterogeneity with a comparative perspective. It shows that AI-acceptance mechanisms are selectively conditioned by institutional setting, underscoring the importance of considering both individual perceptions and contextual conditions when designing AI implementation strategies in public auditing.

Natalia Alonso-Morales, Alejandro Sáez-Martín, A. López-Hernández et al. · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

Corporate governance in focus: how audit committee characteristics shape the auditor’s report

Purpose: The research aims to analyze the main qualitative characteristics of the independent auditor's report and the audit committee's report of companies listed on the B3 (Brazilian Stock Exchange). Methodology: The research is descriptive, and the data presents information from 189 different companies according to the stock exchange classification, 10 sectors, and 19 subsectors. Results: For the audit committees, a consistent increase in the publication of Audit Committee Reports was observed, reflecting greater transparency and commitment to good corporate governance practices. Additionally, the frequency of meetings varied according to the sector and the economic context, with an increase in years of instability, evidencing greater activity of the committees during critical periods. Contributions of the Study: To offer a little-explored national empirical approach, as well as to propose an integrated view between audit and governance. It is recommended that future studies advance in measuring the effectiveness of these committees based on objective performance indicators and financial impacts on companies.

Pedro Antonio Melo Moreira, Naiara Leite dos Santos Sant’Ana, Maria Fernanda Silva Gomes et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

A GOVERNANCE-ORIENTED PROMPT ENGINEERING FRAMEWORK FOR AI-ASSISTED INTERNAL AUDITING

The diffusion of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) across organizational environments is reshaping both the objects of internal audit and the tools auditors use during assurance work. Although prior research has discussed AI adoption in auditing and the risks associated with large language models (LLMs), less attention has been paid to how auditors should structure, document, and govern their own interaction with these systems. This study adopts a conceptual synthesis design and integrates three literature domains: internal audit standards and governance guidance, LLM risk and security frameworks, and prompt engineering / human–AI interaction research. Based on this synthesis, the study develops a governance-oriented framework that links 13 audit-specific prompt types to the main phases of the internal audit lifecycle: planning, fieldwork, reporting, and follow-up. The proposed framework treats prompts and AI-assisted outputs not as informal productivity aids, but as reviewable working-paper artifacts subject to evidentiary discipline, human validation, and documentation controls. The analysis indicates that structured prompting can improve repeatability, transparency, and professional skepticism by making assumptions explicit, constraining unsupported inference, and strengthening the linkage between AI-generated text and auditor-supplied evidence. The article contributes to the literature by reframing prompt engineering as a governable audit competency and by providing a lifecycle-based prompt taxonomy for practical implementation. It also clarifies that LLM output should be used as intermediate analytical support rather than as audit evidence or authoritative judgment.

Özden Şentürk · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Navigating institutional audit: a new institutional theory perspective on quality assurance in Ghanaian universities

The rapid expansion of higher education in sub-Saharan Africa, coupled with the adoption of quality assurance (QA) audit systems modelled on international frameworks, has created significant implementation challenges. While extensive research exists on QA audits in Western and Asian contexts, the African perspective-particularly how institutional leaders interpret and respond to audit pressures-remains underexplored. This qualitative multiple-case study applies New Institutional Theory (NIT) to examine how senior leaders in four Ghanaian public universities perceive and respond to institutional audits. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 university leaders (Vice-Chancellors, Registrars, QA Directors, Deans of Academic Affairs). Data were analyzed using hybrid thematic analysis incorporating both deductive coding (NIT concepts) and inductive coding (emergent themes). Findings reveal a legitimacy paradox wherein leaders balance external compliance demands with internal resource constraints that hinder authentic QA implementation. Leaders simultaneously understand audits as compliance instruments (coercive isomorphism), improvement tools (normative isomorphism), accountability mechanisms, and accreditation pathways. Persistent challenges including inadequate preparedness, inefficient data management, and communication failures produce decoupling-where formal audit structures are adopted but fail to integrate into everyday practice. Universities respond through mimetic strategies including decentralizing quality management, enhancing data systems, engaging in professional networks, and developing internal QA capacity. The study demonstrates that audit challenges reflect deeper institutional legitimacy issues rather than mere operational failures. Decoupling emerges not as organizational failure but as strategic management-a rational response to competing pressures in resource-constrained environments. By positioning Ghana as a critical case for examining isomorphism and decoupling, this research offers a transferable analytical model for understanding QA implementation in developing higher education systems. The findings hold significant implications for policymakers and institutional leaders seeking to align regulatory compliance with authentic quality culture.

Emmanuel Nyarko Oware, S. Mokoena · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

ISSAI AND THE QUALITY OF PUBLIC AUDIT REPORTS IN ANGOLA'S COURT OF ACCOUNTS: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE ON STANDARDS IMPLEMENTATION (2019–2024)

This article analyses the influence of the implementation of the International Standards of Supreme Audit Institutions (ISSAI) on the quality of audit reports produced by Angola's Court of Accounts. It assumes that report quality is not merely a matter of drafting, but an expression of the methodological maturity of the audit process. The study adopts a mixed-methods approach, combining questionnaire data from 90 participants with documentary analysis of 40 audit reports and audit plans produced between 2019 and 2024. The documentary matrix was based on 34 requirements of ISSAI 4000, grouped into general requirements, planning, evidence gathering, evidence evaluation, reporting and follow-up. Five hypotheses were formulated regarding the association between ISSAI implementation, report quality, training, professional experience, financial conditions and internal institutional mechanisms. The results indicate a predominance of initial implementation: 91.1% of respondents classified ISSAI implementation at that level, while 83.3% assessed report quality as intermediate. Documentary analysis confirmed this diagnosis, with 71.1% of the assessed requirements at the initial level, 23.9% with no implementation, 3.6% at the intermediate level and only 1.4% at the advanced level. The most significant gaps concern materiality, level of assurance, sampling, formal inquiries, documentation, quality management and follow-up of recommendations. The article concludes that achieving advanced report quality requires transforming ISSAI from a formal reference into an institutional practice that is documented, reviewed and subject to follow-up.

Mário Munto Ndala · 1 citation
Open access Aug 2026

Audit Non-Compliance and Development Outcomes in Nigeria: An Integrated Analysis and Consequences of Failing to Meet International Auditing Standards in FIRS and Customs

This study investigates the integrated consequences of Nigeria’s non-compliance with international auditing standards in the Federal Inland Revenue Service and the Nigeria Customs Service on economic, diplomatic, infrastructural, political, institutional, and social outcomes from 2020 to 2025. The research was motivated by the June 2025 cancellation of $4 million from the World Bank’s Fiscal Governance and Institutions Project, attributed to audit reports from FIRS and Customs that failed to meet international standards. Despite ongoing public financial management reforms, persistent audit weaknesses continue to undermine revenue assurance, fiscal credibility, and access to concessional financing in Nigeria. The study sought to address the gap in literature by analyzing multiple consequence domains simultaneously rather than in isolation, using a theoretically grounded and empirically robust framework. The study was guided by eight objectives and corresponding hypotheses derived from Principal-Agent Theory and Institutional Theory. Principal-Agent Theory explains how audit reports function as monitoring mechanisms to reduce information asymmetry between the state, as agent, and citizens and lenders, as principals. Institutional Theory explains why formal adoption of International Standards of Supreme Audit Institutions and International Public Sector Accounting Standards has not translated into substantive compliance, a phenomenon known as decoupling. The research adopted an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design. The quantitative phase used panel data from 2020–2025 drawn from World Bank Implementation Status Reports, IMF Article IV Reports, Debt Management Office reports, Central Bank of Nigeria statistics, National Bureau of Statistics data, and Office of the Auditor-General for the Federation annual reports. Seemingly Unrelated Regression and Structural Equation Modeling were applied using Stata 18 and AMOS 28 to test the hypotheses. The qualitative phase involved 25 key informant interviews with senior officials from FIRS, Customs, OAuGF, the Federal Ministry of Finance, and the National Assembly BudgetOffice. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis in NVivo 14. Findings from secondary data show that audit non-compliance significantly reduces disbursement rates by 12.4 percentage points, increases sovereign bond spreads by 145.6 basis points, raises revenue leakage by 0.89% of GDP, lowers project implementation rates by 9.75 percentage points, and decreases social spending by 1.34 percentage points, all significant at the 5% level. SEM results confirm significant negative paths from audit non-compliance to economic, diplomatic, infrastructural, institutional, and social outcomes. Primary data corroborate these results, with respondents strongly agreeing that audit non-compliance contributes to revenue leakage and weakens access to financing and social spending. Qualitative analysis identified political interference, capacity gaps, and weak sanctions as key drivers of non-compliance. All eight null hypotheses were rejected, confirming that audit non-compliance is a systemic risk to Nigeria’s development trajectory. The study concludes that audit non-compliance is not merely a technical failure but a governance challenge with far-reaching consequences. It reduces fiscal space, increases debt vulnerability, weakens diplomatic standing with multilateral institutions, delays infrastructure projects, undermines legislative oversight, and constrains social sector spending. The findings extend Principal-Agent Theory by demonstrating its relevance in sovereign lending relationships and contribute to Institutional Theory by illustrating decoupling in public sector reform. Based on these findings, the study recommends strengthening the legal and operational independence of the Office of the Auditor-General, investing in auditor capacity and digital infrastructure, enforcing sanctions for unresolved audit queries, enhancing legislative oversight and public disclosure, and linking audit compliance to performance management in revenue agencies. The study acknowledges limitations related to data availability, causality constraints, and generalizability, and suggests areas for further research, including subnational analysis, longitudinal impact assessment, political economy studies, and comparative analysis with peer countries.

Obinwanne Kenechukwu Aruomah · 0 citations