Across diverse tasks and roles, model scales, and MoE architectures, DEP achieves better overall accuracy than static pruning and merging baselines, and generalizes to workflows unseen in training without retraining.
Abstract
Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architectures scale language models efficiently by activating only a few experts per token, but the saving is confined to computation: every expert must stay resident on the accelerator, so memory bounds where these models can be deployed. Expert pruning reduces this footprint, yet existing methods are static --- a single mask, calibrated offline, is applied to the model for every subsequent request. This assumption can fail when the workload is heterogeneous, most prominently in multi-agent systems, where one backbone serves many tasks and roles at once: our analysis shows that different tasks and roles recruit different experts, while static methods assign one fixed subset to all of them. We therefore propose Dynamic Expert Pruning (DEP), which rests on a finding we establish here: an agent's system and task prompts are by themselves sufficient to identify the experts that agent and its task require, since that text already describes what the agent will do. A lightweight predictor, trained once on workflow transcripts, turns those prompts into a specialized per-request mask in a single forward pass, with no per-configuration calibration. Across diverse tasks and roles, model scales, and MoE architectures, DEP achieves better overall accuracy than static pruning and merging baselines, and generalizes to workflows unseen in training without retraining. Its margin over those baselines is largest when few experts are retained, suggesting that the role specialization inherent to multi-agent systems permits sparser serving than static pruning allows.
Language model agents increasingly automate post-training, but when given the full training stack they converge on supervised fine-tuning and spend most effort revising training data. Existing systems give the agent one kind of control, selecting rows from a fixed pool or calling a generator, whereas a human data engin...
Bing-Xiang He, Peng Sun, Shi-Hao Peng et al.· 0 citations
Multi-agent systems (MAS) based on large language models (LLMs) have become a powerful way to address complex problems, and their effectiveness depends critically on the collaboration topology that decides which agents participate and how they communicate. Recent work learns to generate this topology from the task quer...
Gated-Memory Routing is proposed, which conditions each decision on the query and a learned execution memory, and attains the best average accuracy, exceeding the strongest baseline by 2.44 points, while reducing HumanEval inference cost by 31.9% relative to that baseline.
Rakibul Hasan Rajib, Meng Zheng, Qian Lou· 3 citations
X-Tree improves over standard recipes at matched data and budget by up to 4.5% SR on WebArena, 5.8% SR on ScienceWorld and 4.1% success on WebShop, and matched analyses attribute the gains to the X-Tree structure and the three integrations.
Si-Tao Cheng, Xun-Jian Yin, Zhi-Yuan Sun et al.· 1 citation
SAIGE, a lightweight multi-agent collaboration mechanism based on Semantic-Aware Incremental Graph Evolution, is proposed, suggesting that multi-agent superiority is bounded by task structure rather than universal, and that more agents do not necessarily make a system more intelligent.
Yizhen Yuan, Yi-Bo Wu, Yi-Han Zhang et al.· 0 citations
Results characterize when runtime-controlled composition of coding-agent products improves execution accuracy, as well as when runtime-controlled composition of coding-agent products improves execution accuracy.
Zheng-Yu Chen, Lin-Feng Liu, Hong Li et al.· 0 citations
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 13, 2026
Machine-learning networks can learn without detailed instructions from a designer. Those that do may offer insight into how the brain reorganizes itself during learning.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduSep 29, 2026
Professor Sherry Turkle’s new book, “Artificial Intimacy,” offers a withering critique of chatbots and the antisocial dynamics she believes they encourage.