Strength and durability prediction of sustainable concrete incorporating rubber aggregate and micro silica

Explainable Random Forest Framework for Predicting Compressive Strength of Sustainable Concrete Incorporating Industrial Waste Materials

Compressive strength is the single most important design parameter governing the safety, serviceability, and economy of concrete structures, yet its determination through standard 7-, 14-, or 28-day destructive cylinder/cube testing is slow, costly, and unable to assess concrete already cast in place. This study develops and evaluates a Random Forest (RF) regression model to predict the compressive strength of concrete directly from eight standard mix-design parameters — cement, blast furnace slag, fly ash, water, superplasticizer, coarse aggregate, fine aggregate, and curing age — using Yeh's (1998) benchmark dataset of 1,030 experimentally tested concrete mixtures. Following data cleaning, exploratory correlation analysis, an 80:20 train-test split, and five-fold GridSearchCV hyperparameter tuning, the optimized Random Forest model is benchmarked against Linear Regression, Ridge Regression, and Support Vector Regression using the coefficient of determination (R²), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), and Mean Absolute Error (MAE). The Random Forest model achieves the strongest predictive performance of the models tested, substantially outperforming the linear baselines and confirming that concrete strength development is governed by non-linear interactions among mix constituents. Feature importance analysis further shows that curing age and cement content are the dominant predictors, while water content exerts a clear negative influence consistent with Abrams' Law, and coarse/fine aggregates contribute comparatively little, consistent with their role as largely inert fillers. These findings demonstrate that Random Forest regression offers a fast, accurate, and interpretable, non-destructive alternative to conventional strength testing, with practical value for mix-design optimization, quality control, and early-stage structural decision-making.

Prediction of compressive and flexural strength of modified concrete using machine learning

Results suggest that, within the present five-fold cross-validation setting and limited-sample dataset, RBF kernel ridge regression captures the nonlinear relationships more effectively than conventional linear models; however, broader generalization should be verified using larger datasets and additional validation.

Experimental investigation of the mechanical and durability performance of hybrid basalt fiber-reinforced concrete using gaussian process regression-based prediction

TabPFN-Based Prediction of Concrete Compressive Strength

The use of supplementary cementitious materials such as fly ash can reduce environmental impacts and improve the sustainability of concrete construction. However, the nonlinear interactions among mixture design parameters make accurate prediction of concrete compressive strength challenging. In this study, TabPFN, a pre-trained foundation model for tabular data, was applied to predict the compressive strength of fly ash concrete and compared with tuned Random Forest, support vector regression, an artificial neural network, LightGBM, CatBoost, Ridge regression, and Abrams empirical regression. A dataset containing 1062 samples and eight mixture-level variables was used for model development and evaluation. Predictive performance was assessed using the coefficient of determination, mean absolute error, and root mean square error over 100 repeated random splits. The results showed that TabPFN achieved the best overall performance, with an average coefficient of determination of 0.9329, a mean absolute error of 3.2758 MPa, and a root mean square error of 4.6678 MPa. Compared with the strongest tuned gradient-boosting baseline, CatBoost, TabPFN reduced the mean absolute error and root mean square error by 0.8768 MPa and 0.8560 MPa, respectively. Furthermore, repeated-split conformal prediction demonstrated reliable uncertainty quantification, with an average prediction interval coverage probability of 0.9615 and a mean prediction interval width of 23.4554 MPa. SHAP analysis identified the water-to-cement ratio, mortar strength, and water-to-binder ratio as important variables, while additional multicollinearity and feature ablation analyses indicated that correlated ratio variables should be interpreted cautiously. The results indicate that TabPFN provides an accurate, robust, and uncertainty-aware framework for preliminary prediction of 28-day fly ash concrete compressive strength.

Comparative Analysis of AI and Statistical Models for Predicting Mechanical and Durability-Related Properties of Alkali-Activated Recycled Aggregate Concrete

Alkali-activated recycled aggregate concrete (AARAC) offers a sustainable alternative to traditional concrete but suffers from complex, non-linear mechanical behavior that challenges conventional prediction methods. This study develops and compares five machine learning models, linear regression (LR), M5P, Random Forest (RF), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) and XGBoost, for predicting the compressive strength (Cs), flexural strength (Fs), splitting tensile strength (Ss), pull-out bond strength (PT), and water absorption (Wa%) of AARAC. A dataset of 360 experimental samples, incorporating natural aggregate, recycled concrete aggregate (RCA), cement block aggregate (CBA), water-to-cement ratio (W/C), alkaline treatment status, and slump, was used. Models were evaluated via train/test split (80/20) and 10-fold cross-validation using R2, MAE, RMSE, and MAPE. Random Forest achieved the highest test R2 (0.8736) and lowest test MAPE (1.418%) and XGBoost (R2 = 0.8605, MAPE = 1.557%). KNN and M5P performed moderately, while LR was the weakest (R2 = 0.6958, MAPE = 2.147%). All tree-based models exhibited overfitting, with training R2 up to 0.98. Scatter plot analysis revealed systematic underprediction by RF for Cs (constant offset of ~2 MPa) and increasing bias for PT, Ss, and Wa% at higher values. XGBoost gave perfect predictions for PT and Wa% but underpredicted Cs and Fs. K-fold cross-validation confirmed XGBoost as the most robust (mean R2 = 0.9844). Correlation analysis showed W/C strongly increases Wa% (r = 0.80) and decreases PT (r = −0.73); RCA negatively affects mechanical properties, while CBA and alkaline treatment improve them. The study concludes that ensemble tree models, particularly Random Forest, are superior for AARAC prediction, but systematic bias requires post hoc calibration.

Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Compressive Strength in Basalt Fiber Reinforced Concrete

Accurate prediction of the mechanical strength of Basalt Fiber Reinforced Concrete (BFRC) is critical for structural design, safety assessment, and the advancement of sustainable infrastructure in civil engineering. Traditional prediction methods often fail to capture the nonlinear relationships between BFRC mix proportions and resulting strength characteristics, leading to unreliable estimations. To address this limitation, this study proposes the Optimized Moment Balanced Machine (OMBM), an advanced machine learning model developed to improve the predictive accuracy of BFRC strength parameters. The model was trained and evaluated using key input features, including cement content, silica fume, fly ash, superplasticizer, water, aggregate composition, and fiber property parameters. The performance of the OMBM was benchmarked against four established machine learning models, such as Least Squares Support Vector Machine (LSSVM), Backpropagation Neural Network (BPNN), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), and Linear Regression (LR). Results from ten-fold cross-validation show that OMBM consistently outperforms the comparison models across five evaluation metrics. It achieved the lowest RMSE (2.411), MAE (1.788), and MAPE (4.08%), along with the highest values for correlation coefficient (R = 0.978), and coefficient of determination (R2 = 0.956). Furthermore, the OMBM achieved a Reference Index (RI) score of 1.000, which confirms its position as the leading predictive model within this comparative framework. These results confirm the robustness and reliability of the proposed OMBM model, making it a highly effective tool for accurate strength prediction of BFRC. This approach offers significant potential for the advancement of sustainable infrastructure by enabling more accurate and efficient use of concrete materials.