Skip to content
Preprint

Power and Sample Size Calculations for Hybrid Controlled Trials

Aug 2026 · 0 citations · 41 references
Mathematics

TL;DR

This work proposes a 5+3 design for HCT sample-size determination based on an inverse probability weighting estimator of the average treatment effect, and establishes the asymptotic distribution of the estimator and proves that its variance is determined by these design parameters under the proposed working models.

Abstract

Hybrid controlled trials (HCTs) augment randomized controls with external controls (ECs) to address practical challenges in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and improve statistical power in settings such as rare diseases, oncology, and pediatrics. However, prospective sample-size determination is challenging because the required RCT sample size depends on the comparability of ECs with RCT controls, which are unavailable at the planning stage. We propose a 5+3 design for HCT sample-size determination based on an inverse probability weighting estimator of the average treatment effect. The framework uses five conventional RCT design parameters and three additional scalar parameters characterizing EC comparability: the number of outcome-drift-free ECs, an overlap coefficient for the covariate distributions of the RCT and ECs, and a correlation coefficient linking the sampling mechanism to the control potential outcome. We establish the asymptotic distribution of the estimator and prove that its variance is determined by these design parameters under the proposed working models, yielding sample-size calculations for both continuous and binary outcomes. Simulation studies evaluate finite-sample performance, and a real clinical application illustrates its practical use. The method is implemented in the hctdesign R package.

View source

Similar papers

Open access Oct 2026

Power With Confounders in Clinical Trials Using External Controls.

When the number of patients is limited in clinical trials for rare diseases and pediatric developments, enrolling sufficient participants for confirmatory randomized clinical trials is difficult. Alternative trial designs using external controls have been proposed: augmented randomized clinical trials (ARCTs) and suppl...

Kentaro Kudo, Tosiya Sato · 0 citations
Sep 2026

Covariate-adaptive randomization with dropouts

While clinical trials are often regarded as the gold standard by medical researchers and regulatory agencies, the statistical properties of typical randomized controlled trials heavily depend on large sample sizes, which may not always be achievable due to budget constraints or other practical limitations. To address t...

Meng-Hsuan Sung, Qian Xiao, Ye Shen · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

Multivariate Analysis of Data From Crossover Clinical Trials

ABSTRACT In crossover designs, multiple outcomes are often collected to assess treatment effectiveness in a comprehensive manner. Also, interest has grown in comparing intra‐subject variability between treatments in such designs. We present three distinct multivariate linear mixed‐effects models, with the choice of the...

Yi Jiang, V. Chinchilli · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

A Frequentist Approach Using Weighted Estimating Equations for Survival Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trial With External Control Arm.

Clinical trials using a hybrid control, which integrates a randomized control with external control data, may be one solution to facilitate clinical development where traditional randomized controlled trials are challenging. Despite its attractive features, systematic differences between controls can introduce bias in...

Ryo Sawamoto, Koji Oba, Y. Matsuyama · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

A practical application for the efficient use of historical data in randomized controlled design using systematic review data.

INTRODUCTION Randomized controlled trials are the gold standard for evaluating interventions but are resource-intensive and impose considerable burden on participants. Historical control designs, which incorporate data from previous trials into new analyses, could reduce sample size requirements, but their practical ap...

Tim J. Schouten, A. Gabrio, Jochen W L Cals et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

Adaptive Sampling of Costly Outcomes in Randomized Clinical Trials

In some randomized trials the primary outcome is costly or slow to measure, while auxiliary variables that predict it are available for everyone. The outcome can then be measured in a probability sample. We study an adaptive design in which the statistician who selects outcomes to measure is blinded to treatment assign...

Shuo-Yang Wang, Wan-Yue Zhang, Ling-Li Yang et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.