Skip to content

COSMOS: Soft Mechanism Mixtures with Verifiable Routing for Long-Horizon PDE Forecasting

Oct 2026 · 0 citations · 15 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

This work proposes COSMOS (Cooperative Operator Specialists with Mechanism-level Operator Soft-routing, a soft mechanism-mixture neural operator), a soft mechanism-mixture neural operator that supports compositional accuracy, not mechanism identity.

Abstract

Neural operators offer an efficient alternative to classical PDE solvers, but most learn a monolithic map per equation family and discretization. Real systems are compositional: transport, diffusion, wave, and reaction processes can act simultaneously. Existing mixture-of-experts operators typically use sparse top-$K$ routing, although concurrent physics is naturally a blend rather than a discrete choice. We propose COSMOS (Cooperative Operator Specialists with Mechanism-level Operator Soft-routing), a soft mechanism-mixture neural operator. Four process-biased specialists remain active at every step and are continuously mixed by a learned gate, with their features fused by a small network. Specialists share a coarse latent grid, while a zero-initialized full-resolution residual restores detail lost through the bottleneck. We also introduce an operator-splitting compositional benchmark with known mixture weights $w^\star$ per trajectory. Against family-tuned FNO under 20-step rollouts, an initial 3-seed evaluation suggested gains on diffusion--reaction, parity on Navier--Stokes, and weaker shallow-water performance. An 11-seed audit showed that the diffusion--reaction gain was unstable, motivating caution in small-seed rollout comparisons and precluding a reliable accuracy-win claim on these families. Ablations show that uniform routing or removing the specialist mixture substantially degrades stable-regime rollouts. On the labeled benchmark, dense soft routing yields $2.2\times$ lower error than hard top-1 routing at identical fusion; using generator weights $w^\star$ at inference further lowers rollout error to $0.034$, diagnosing limitations of the learned gate. However, routing labels do not align with the specialists'intended mechanisms: COSMOS supports compositional accuracy, not mechanism identity.

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Sep 2026

Regime-Aware Coupled Orchestration of Neural Operator Specialists for Multiphysics Dynamics

Real-world physics often unfolds over a variety of characteristic lengths and time scales. These non-uniformities are among the main reasons numerical simulations remain expensive when used predictively on practical systems: the same computational domain can contain smooth transport, vortical structures, thin interface...

Paolo Guida, Vijayamanikandan Vijayarangan, Hong G. Im et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Physics-Informed Foresight Pruning for Sparse PINN Solvers of Nonlinear PDEs

Small-batch PINN-NTK diagnostics further show that residual fidelity, solution accuracy, and kernel conditioning are distinct objectives, motivating pruning methods that explicitly balance solution-side and residual-side training dynamics during optimization.

A. Karimi, Uvini Balasuriya Mudiyanselage, Kookjin Lee · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Learning When to Refine: Long-Horizon Reinforcement Learning for Budgeted Neural-Operator PDE Solvers

Neural operators provide fast surrogates for time-dependent PDEs, but autoregressive deployment creates a refinement-allocation problem: prediction errors vary over space and time, while only a finite number of local corrections can be committed along a trajectory. We formulate this as budgeted adaptive neural-operator...

An-Ge Tong · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

SMORE: Stability-Promoting Mesh-Agnostic Model Reduction for Time-Dependent PDEs

This work proposes SMORE, a mesh-agnostic framework for model order reduction of time-dependent PDEs, whose latent dynamics are trained with Lyapunov-guided stability regularization, which promotes stable long-horizon rollouts and theoretical guarantees under the stated structural assumptions.

Yang-Yuan Li, Wei-Chao Li, Shao-Wu Pan · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Climate Physics Dynamic Matching

Climate Physics Dynamic Matching is presented, a variational simulation-free dynamics informed framework for weather forecasting that combines an advection-type physics prior with data-driven components in a variational framework to capture the stochasticity and multi-modality of unresolved atmospheric dynamics.

G. Singh, Frantzeska Lavda, Alexandros Kalousis · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Aug 2026

Learning PDE Time-Stepping with Neural Cellular Automata

This paper proposes a trainable Neural Cellular Automata (NCA) based surrogate model for learning long time PDE dynamics that achieves the lowest long-horizon relative errors on the majority of the experiments.

Esha Saha, Hao Wang · 0 citations

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Sep 29, 2026

Who we become when we talk to machines

Professor Sherry Turkle’s new book, “Artificial Intimacy,” offers a withering critique of chatbots and the antisocial dynamics she believes they encourage.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.