Extensive experiments show that ExpG brings consistent improvements across the tool selection, tool calling, and response generation tasks, enabling smaller agents to outperform larger ones that do not use ExpG, suggesting a promising path toward more robust tool use.
Abstract
The performance bottleneck of agents is increasingly shifting from model capability to the robustness of their execution processes. Tools play a central role as the primary interface through which agents interact with external environments, yet existing methods rarely focus on ensuring robust tool use across diverse runtime conditions. To address this problem, we propose ExpG, a mechanism that builds and refines adaptive guidance capturing each tool's capability boundaries and best practices, thereby enabling agents to use tools more robustly and effectively. ExpG consists of three phases: (1) experience acquisition, which analyzes tool invocation quality from historical execution trajectories, producing structured learnable experiences through multi-aspect attribution; (2) experience distillation, which keeps the experience pool effective by filtering unhelpful experiences, selecting representative ones with an equivalence-class-based method, and summarizing them into generalizable guidance; and (3) experience reuse, which applies the guidance adaptively during future task solving. Extensive experiments show that ExpG brings consistent improvements across the tool selection, tool calling, and response generation tasks, enabling smaller agents to outperform larger ones that do not use ExpG. Moreover, ExpG achieves particularly strong gains in challenging settings, suggesting a promising path toward more robust tool use. Our code, experiments, and results are available.
but struggle when confronted with multi-step, complex task planning that requires interaction with external environments. This paper investigates the architecture, implementation, and efficacy of tool-augmented language agents enhanced with iterative self-critique mechanisms. By integrating external application programming interfaces, structured databases, and computational engines, these agents transcend isolated text generation, evolving into active systems capable of executing concrete actions. However, naive tool utilization often results in cascading errors during prolonged execution trajectories. To mitigate this, we introduce an iterative self-critique framework where the agent continuously evaluates its own outputs, identifies logical fallacies or execution failures, and dynamically recalibrates its plan. This research details a comprehensive methodological framework, formalizing the probabilistic decision-making and critique generation processes. Empirical evaluations across simulated complex environments demonstrate that the proposed architecture significantly improves task success rates, minimizes superfluous tool invocations, and enhances error recovery. The findings indicate that integrating reflective cognition paradigms with modular toolsets is essential for deploying autonomous language agents in high-stakes, real-world applications.
Mabel Kwok· International journal of inf...· 0 citations
This work compares six tool architectures that hold the underlying information and actions similar while varying how they are organized and exposed to the model, across three actors and a total of 11,700 trajectories to show that, even when tools provide similar capabilities, tool architecture changes agent behavior.
Xiangzhe Xu, H. Saghir, Qianhui Wu et al.· 1 citation
This work introduces Model Automated Deployment Engine (MADE), a dual-agent coordination system that iteratively constructs and validates the deployment artifacts, updates its deployment belief based on execution feedback, and revisits invalid upstream artifacts until the model is successfully served as a ready-to-call API that can then be used by other agents.
Yicheng Liu, Bolin Zhang, Weiran Liu et al.· 0 citations
EvoSOP is introduced, a framework that empowers agents to extract SOPs from execution trajectories and iteratively optimize the toolset through a systematic lifecycle of construction, merging, evaluation, and pruning, providing a scalable pathway for the development of self-evolving agents.
Haipeng Ding, Yuexiang Xie, Zhewei Wei et al.· 2 citations
This paper synthesizes 27 benchmark, taxonomy, and audit papers (2023-2026), spanning 19 distinct benchmarks, into a cross-cutting taxonomy of agent limitations, the first synthesis that integrates evidence across tool use, planning, long-horizon reasoning, multi-agent coordination, safety, and measurement validity into a single, unified taxonomy of LLM agent limitations.
Wael S. Albayaydh, Rui Zhao, Ivan Flechais· 1 citation