XS-VLA is introduced, a lightweight framework that teaches tiny VLA policies "where to look" and "how to move" without increasing deployment-time model cost and shows that explicit spatial grounding and latent action-structure learning can make tiny VLA models effective for robotic manipulation.
Abstract
Tiny Vision-Language-Action models are appealing for real-time robotic control, but reducing model scale often weakens two capabilities essential for manipulation: task-conditioned spatial grounding and coherent action generation. We introduce XS-VLA, a lightweight framework that teaches tiny VLA policies"where to look"and"how to move"without increasing deployment-time model cost. For spatial grounding, Coarse-Grained Spatial Distillation uses Qwen3-VL-4B to produce teacher-derived coarse image-plane location labels for task-relevant objects, which are quantized into a spatial vocabulary and distilled into a SmolVLM2-0.25B backbone without human annotations. For action generation, Latent Flow Matching combines a CVAE-style latent variable with flow-based policy learning to organize multimodal demonstrations during training and produce stable action chunks at deployment. On LIBERO, XS-VLA improves average success from 82.8\% to 90.3\% over SmolVLA-0.25B and improves LIBERO-Long from 63.0\% to 89.0\%. In real-world experiments, we design three tasks covering single-arm placement, precision bimanual stacking, and long-horizon sequential coordination, where XS-VLA improves average task success from 21.7\% to 65.0\%. These results show that explicit spatial grounding and latent action-structure learning can make tiny VLA models effective for robotic manipulation.
The real-robot benchmark demonstrates that StellaVLA can use both human/robot demos and human-to-robot (XR) demos as in-context structured demonstration to help VLA model adapt to OOD tasks.
Siyu Xu, Yun-Ke Wang, Zi-Jian Wang et al.· 3 citations
DiMaS is proposed, a Distribution-Matching Steering strategy tailored to flow-matching VLAs, which transports between representation distributions rather than shifting along a fixed direction, and it effectively controls behavior across two state-of-the-art VLAs.
Pegah Khayatan, Sara Meziane, Jayneel Parekh et al.· arXiv.org· 0 citations
The results suggest that VLAs have rich, linearly readable internal representations of semantic quantities like task progress, and that learning to read these signals offers a lightweight, interpretable path toward monitoring deployed visuomotor policies.
Atiksh Bhardwaj, E. W. Duan, Prithwish Dan et al.· 3 citations
RhinoVLA is proposed, a deployment-oriented VLA model co-designed with the Huixi R1 edge SoC that adopts a token-efficient Qwen3-VL backbone and a continuous Action Expert, reducing the VLM-side token and computation burden while preserving pretrained multimodal capability.
TemporalFlow-VLA provides a compact, physically grounded interface for exploiting ordered execution history without explicit motion estimation or geometric processing at deployment, and shows its clearest advantage over prior methods on longer-horizon, multi-stage manipulation.
Jia-Rui Yang, Ye-Hao Lu, Yu-Ning Su et al.· 2 citations
V-Link is proposed, which explicitly recovers visual representations during the vision-language (VL) to action (A) feature transfer and injects them into Action DiT through asymmetric pathways.
Ye-Hao Lu, Jia-Rui Yang, Yu-Ning Su et al.· 0 citations
Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.