Jul 2026· International Conferences on Human-Machine Systems· pp. 602-609· 0 citations· 16 references
Abstract
The fast deployment of large language models (LLMs) in critical-domain applications such as financial systems has introduced new types of security vulnerabilities (e.g., adversarial prompt injections, semantic obfuscation, and multi-stage social engineering attacks) that conventional countermeasures cannot typically handle. These vulnerabilities need to be detected through the natural language interface interactions, and relevant security policies need to be applied based on the context of the interactions. In this paper, we present a novel Adaptive LLM Threat Response (ALTR) framework, that supports trustworthy decision-making in LLM-enabled applications by integrating real-time behavioral anomaly detection with context-aware prompt validation to mitigate the risks of vulnerable LLMs. Specifically, we develop a Behavioral Anomaly Engine (BAE) that uses Isolation Forests to identify anomalies in user behavior during LLM interactions in financial systems. In addition, we develop a Context-Aware Prompt Classifier (CAPC) that employs DistilBERT and syntactic analysis to determine malicious inputs. To address the latency requirements in threat response, we create a Threat Response Memory (TRM) knowledge base that stores the aggregated behavioral and semantic risk signals from prior user sessions, and uses LSTM to perform longitudinal threat analysis to predict threat severity. We perform validation experiments using public datasets and a taxonomy of AI-based threats outlined in the Cisco AI Defense Capture-the-Flag (CTF) challenge. Our experiment results show the effectiveness of our ALTR approach by achieving an accuracy of 0.961, an AUC of 0.961, and a low false-negative rate of 0.9%, while maintaining an inference latency ($<\mathbf{2 0 m s}$) of across a range of LLM security vulnerabilities.
A role-layer framework is introduced to unify LLM risks and defenses, and identifies three key open challenges: moving from static detection accuracy to budgeted ecosystem-level risk evaluation, hardening LLM-centered verification pipelines against adversarial manipulation, and deploying auditable human-in-the-loop verification systems for trustworthy real-world misinformation defense.
AlIBI is presented, an automated adaptive black-box attack framework that generates and iteratively refines adversarial comments using detector reasoning and feedback and is motivated to motivate security-aware designs that carefully calibrate trust between natural-language context and program evidence.
The reasoning model DeepSeek-R1 was more susceptible to jailbreak attacks than the non-reasoning model DeepSeek-V3, and different prompt-level defenses were effective against static jailbreaks.
V. T. Hayashi, Milton Pedro Pagliuso Neto, C. Miers et al.· IEEE Access· 0 citations
This thesis proposes a unified two-layer approach to enhancing the trustworthiness and security of LLM-enabled systems and introduces the Adaptive LLM Threat Response (ALTR) framework, which integrates behavioral anomaly detection, context-aware prompt classification, and temporal threat memory to identify and mitigate adversarial interactions in real time.
Experimental results show that LLMs, when guided by rubric-based prompts and supplemented with ATT&CK domain knowledge, achieve robust performance across detection, localization, and TTP mapping tasks.
Joon-Young Gwak, Aubrey Strier, Zhaohan Xi et al.· 0 citations
The results establish that LLM-based log analysis creates an inherent confused deputy vulnerability where untrusted data and trusted instructions compete indistinguishably for model attention, requiring defense in-depth architectures and continued human oversight for security-critical decisions.
Rabimba Karanjai, Yang Lu, H. Madhavarao et al.· 2 citations