TL;DR
Rather than supplanting authors, AI should be viewed as an assistant that augments human capabilities while preserving the reflective and creative dimensions that define authentic scholarship.
This editorial highlights the evolving principles of responsible GAI use in publishing, including the prohibition of GAI authorship, disclosure of GAI assistance, and continued human oversight.
A conceptual model requiring prospective validation is proposed as a conceptual model requiring prospective validation, intended to move beyond ad hoc AI use toward structured, competency-based training that strengthens analytical reasoning, ethical judgment, and equity-oriented practice in AI-enabled public health sys...
GenAI should be viewed as a powerful augmentative tool, not a replacement for human educators, and its successful integration will depend on leveraging its strengths to enhance efficiency and scalability while preserving the essential humanistic elements of medical practice through expert oversight and validation.
The integration of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools into higher education is rapidly accelerating, yet the educational ecosystem appears largely unprepared for the scale and speed of adoption. Our recent international survey of over 1,200 university students and postdoctoral fellows in the medical and l...
The analysis concludes that the future of education lies not in replacing teachers but in developing hybrid models where AI complements human educators, and requires robust ethical guidelines, human-centered design, and policies ensuring equity, transparency, and accountability.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.
