Sep 2026· Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review· Vol 21· 0 citations
Abstract
General Background Corporate sustainability requires accountable governance and responsible administration. Specific Background The resource extraction sector faces severe volatility, necessitating optimal liquidity, rigorous oversight, and transparent non-financial reporting. Knowledge Gap Previous studies present inconsistent findings regarding whether sustainability disclosures, institutional monitoring, and liquidity reserves determine market capitalization through intervening financial metrics. Aims This study investigates how environmental, social, and governance reports, administrative frameworks, and liquid assets dictate market assessment, examining financial returns as a mediator in Indonesian extraction enterprises. Results Multiple regression and Sobel tests on 144 observations reveal that liquid assets significantly drive financial returns, while sustainability reporting and administrative monitoring do not. Furthermore, administrative monitoring, liquid assets, and financial returns directly dictate market assessment, whereas sustainability reporting exhibits no significant relationship. Financial returns successfully mediate the relationship between liquid assets and market assessment, but fail to mediate other variables. Novelty This research demonstrates that within volatile extraction industries, tangible liquidity reserves dictate market perception more immediately than non-financial sustainability disclosures. Implications Executives must prioritize liquidity management and rigorous administrative monitoring to maximize investor confidence and secure market capitalization.
Highlights:
Optimal liquidity reserves significantly dictate return on assets within resource extraction enterprises.
Strict administrative oversight directly guarantees higher market assessment among financial investors.
Sustainability disclosures fail to immediately translate into short-term financial returns.
Keywords: Environmental Social Governance, Financial Performance, Firm Value, Internal Control System, Cash Holding
General Background The banking sector functions as a vital financial intermediary necessitating robust operational performance to maintain public trust and stimulate macroeconomic growth. Specific Background Regulatory frameworks require financial institutions to maintain their health using risk, administration, profit...
Arneta Pramesti Rahmadani, Wiwit Hariyanto· Indonesian Journal of Law an...· 0 citations
Manufacturing enterprises face intense global competition and volatile production costs, requiring precise corporate governance and optimal financing configurations to sustain profitability. This research employs a quantitative approach using secondary data derived from audited annual reports over a multi-year observat...
A. E. M. Usmany, Paul Usmany· Reslaj : Religion Education...· 0 citations
General Background: Stock prices are important indicators in capital markets because they reflect market valuation of corporate ownership and are closely considered by investors. Specific Background: Infrastructure companies operate in capital-intensive and long-term projects, while the sector experienced a significant...
Rido Firnando, Rusmianto Rusmianto, Depita Anggraini· Indonesian Journal of Innova...· 0 citations
Corporate financial distress remains a persistent challenge for investors, lenders, regulators, and managers because deteriorating financial conditions can disrupt operations, weaken creditworthiness, destroy enterprise value, and threaten long-term economic sustainability. Traditional assessment approaches based prima...
Bridget Joel· International Journal of Res...· 0 citations
This study investigates the empirical relationships among working capital management, corporate liquidity, and profitability while evaluating the moderating role of firm size within the Fast-Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG) manufacturing sector in Indonesia. The investigation utilizes an exhaustive panel dataset of 23 cons...