Sep 2026· Science, Technology, & Human Values· 0 citations· 39 references
Abstract
Writing in Science and Technology Studies (STS) reproduces STS knowledge, yet ways of writing remain invisible and normative within a discipline committed to epistemological openness. Ways of knowing and languaging are inextricably linked: written knowledge plays a central role in scholars’ entry and advancement. We argue that recalibrating norms in teaching STS writing could decentralize dominant, colonial ways of thinking in the field. Although STS scholars are from many geographic and cultural backgrounds and possess diverse “languaging” repertoires, scholarship in White Mainstream English (WME) remains most valued. Constructed linguistic hierarchies disadvantage “non-native” speakers, especially English-language learners (ELLs), thereby marginalizing other ways of knowing. Concurrently, students are also STS-language learners (STSLLs), requiring assimilation to succeed in the field. We propose a critical approach to teaching that prioritizes diverse ways of knowing to liberate the writing and publication process from exclusionary tendencies experienced intersectionally by ELLs and STSLLs. We argue that developing writing skills in STS should involve reflection on presumptions and norms around language, and purposive instruction in STS language learning. Our approach empowers STSLLs and ELLs in this language acquisition, integrating writers of various backgrounds and resisting tendencies to rank and devalue languaging that diverges from WME.
English Language Arts teaching is increasingly defined by a paradox. Contemporary curricula articulate expansive disciplinary aims such as meaning-making, aesthetic engagement, multimodal literacy and critical participation. Yet teachers are simultaneously required to deliver scripted units of work and narrow pedagog...
Beryl Exley· Literacy Research Theory Met...· 0 citations
This Coda synthesizes the contributions to the AILA Review Special Issue on Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Sustainability (DEIS) in Language Education by reframing language education as a practice of relational justice. Across diverse geopolitical contexts, the articles demonstrate that language education is an in...
This essay examines the relationship between translation and epistemic justice within comparative literature studies, particularly in the context of systematic knowledge destruction in the Global South. Using the Israeli military’s deliberate annihilation of Gaza’s educational infrastructure as a paradigmatic example...
This critical dialogue examines how Open Research (OR) principles intersect with qualitative epistemologies in second language acquisition. Drawing on our distinct positionalities—Author 1 as a quantitatively trained psycholinguist and Author 2 as a qualitative critical applied linguist from the Global South—we explo...
Aline Godfroid, P. de Costa· Studies in Second Language A...· 0 citations
This integrative research review panel examines how literacy researchers can cultivate more productive scholarship by working across, between, and against the methodological and theoretical boundaries that have traditionally organized our field. Each paper takes up a different dimension of this challenge. Jang introduc...
Bong-Gee Jang, Corrine M. Wickens, D. Townsend· Literacy Research Theory Met...· 0 citations
Academic writing instruction often positions argumentation and persuasion as the primary modes of civic discourse, reinforcing adversarial forms of public discourse beyond the classroom. This article argues that writing pedagogy centred on joy can reimagine civic writing, orienting it toward relational learning, ethica...
C. Kirsh· Journal of Teaching and Lear...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.