In every setting, pre-adaptation on related auxiliary languages yields no practically meaningful improvements once as little as one hour of target-language data is available, suggesting that relatedness alone may not reliably predict transfer gains in large multilingual ASR, or constitute an effective strategy for extending such models to low-resource languages.
Abstract
Extending automatic speech recognition (ASR) to low-resource African languages is constrained by the prohibitive demands of data collection at scale. A promising direction is to leverage the linguistic relatedness between a low-resource target language and languages previously seen by a model to reduce the volume of target-language data needed for effective adaptation. Although this approach has proven reliable for text-based models, its effectiveness in the speech domain remains contested. We employ a systematic controlled experimental design spanning six factors, two Africa-centric corpora, and four large ASR models, sequentially adapting on a related auxiliary language followed by the target to isolate whether linguistic relatedness reliably predicts cross-lingual transfer gains across these conditions. In every setting, pre-adaptation on related auxiliary languages yields no practically meaningful improvements once as little as one hour of target-language data is available, suggesting that relatedness alone may not reliably predict transfer gains in large multilingual ASR, or constitute an effective strategy for extending such models to low-resource languages.
Empirical analyses show that MoSE improves high-, medium-, and low-resource languages simultaneously, with the largest gains on low-resource speech, thereby breaking the curse of multilinguality without compromising high-resource performance.
Yexing Du, Kaiyuan Liu, Youcheng Pan et al.· 0 citations
This work introduces M-GATE (Multilingual Grammar, Accuracy in Translation, and Efficiency), a benchmark of linguistic proficiency spanning 30 typologically diverse languages from high- to low-resource, and evaluates over 50 models in more than 80 configurations.
Tomáš Burkert, Angelika Peljak-Łapińska, David Zelený· 0 citations
The Cross-Lingual Comprehension Gap (CLCG) is defined as the reduction in response quality when the same content and question are presented in a target language rather than in English.
A PMI-based translation metric is proposed, which is less dependent on the target language and correlates strongly with chrF, and finds that CLA with English predicts translation quality comparably to or better than source-target CLA.
Adnan Al Ali, Kathy Hämmerl, Jindrich Libovický et al.· 0 citations
This work presents DonorRank, a learning-to-rank framework for predicting effective donor languages for zero-shot ASR and evaluates it on two multilingual speech corpora of Indic and African language families, finding transfer patterns that provide practical guidance for multilingual ASR in low-resource settings.
Akriti Dhasmana, Aarohi Srivastava, David Chiang· 0 citations
Overall, the effectiveness of script unification depends on the language, the induced subword overlap, and the available supervision, while within-language coverage becomes more important when target-language supervision is available.