A novel application of using the integrative ERF‐tsunami approach is that features extracted in the reduced domain, particularly from manifold learning, can be mapped back to rupture zones along the fault.
Abstract
A wide selection of linear and non‐linear dimensionality reduction techniques is evaluated on synthetic tsunami data that is the basis for tsunami hazard assessment and computational forecasting. The data were computed from earthquake rupture forecasts (ERFs) supplying initial generation conditions and a linear long‐wave Green's function approach to efficiently calculate tsunami propagation. The dimensionality reduction techniques include various forms of principal component analysis, manifold learning, and neural networks. Both external (e.g., mutual information) and internal (silhouette) metrics are used to evaluate clustering in the reduced dimension, focusing on peak‐nearshore tsunami amplitudes (PNTA) along a nearshore isobath and time‐series (marigrams) at specific nearshore locations. This evaluation is intentionally scoped to cluster‐based downsampling to produce probabilistic inundation maps. For our test case along the Nankai subduction zone, manifold learning methods produced the highest clustering metric scores for PNTA profiles among the examined dimensionality reduction techniques. The marigram results are less consistent, owing primarily to uncertainty in defining appropriate clusters in the original high‐dimensional (ambient) space to establish a “ground truth.” A novel application of using the integrative ERF‐tsunami approach is that features extracted in the reduced domain, particularly from manifold learning, can be mapped back to rupture zones along the fault. This yields targeted fault information associated with unique PNTA profiles and marigram characteristics, such as late‐arriving waves. Further testing would be needed for application‐specific workflows and more complex fault systems, but results from this single subduction zone case study support the consideration of non‐linear techniques (e.g., manifold learning) as alternatives to linear methods.
The Sunda Arc has the potential for a megatsunami with devastating impacts along the west coast of Sumatra and southern Java. Machine learning models still face challenges in predicting tsunami wave heights along the Sunda Arc with high accuracy. Various factors, such as the diverse characteristics of earthquake locati...
Dhedy Husada Fadjar Perdana, Agus Sihabuddin, I. Fachrudin· Journal of Earthquake and Ts...· 0 citations
Accurate and rapid assessment of seismic intensity is crucial for postearthquake emergency response. This is especially true during the initial “black‐box” period, when real‐time data are scarce. To address this challenge, we developed a machine learning‐based (ML) framework for predicting kilometer‐grid‐scale seismic...
Ma Yuan, Jian-Ming Yu, Zhao-Chong Hui et al.· Engineering Reports· 0 citations
Modeling earthquake clustering in space and time is central to understanding seismicity patterns and improving forecasting. The Epidemic‐Type Aftershock Sequence (ETAS) model, grounded in the Hawkes process, has long been the standard approach for describing aftershock triggering through fixed, empirically defined ke...
Cheng-Xiang Zhan, Stephen Wu, Jian-Cang Zhuang et al.· Journal of Geophysical Resea...· 0 citations
The global imperative for early earthquake prediction is indisputable. As computational capabilities continually evolve alongside technological advancements, a profound opportunity emerges for researchers to confront the intricate challenges inherent in detecting and predicting precursory signals associated with earthq...
Vijay Subhash Katta, Gourav Shrivastava, V. Kushwah· Mausam· 0 citations