As Large Language Models (LLMs) grow more capable across diverse tasks, their (in)ability to generalize remains difficult to quantify and poorly understood beyond limited domains. In particular, LLMs are known to struggle generalizing multilingually, to languages outside of English, and that are poorly attested in their training data. To understand why this may be, and what enables some models to perform better than others, we turn to a long history of work across the cognitive sciences, arguing that successful generalization derives from appropriate representations in similarity space. We look at how well LLMs'representations capture the hierarchical similarity structure between distinct languages. Strikingly, we show LLMs'latent representations largely recover the hierarchical structure of the Indo-European language family tree -- grouping languages that are members of the same subfamily closely together in representation space. Furthermore, we show that the degree to which models reflect the similarity structure of languages correlates with their performance on XNLI, a multilingual natural language inference benchmark. This extends classic work on similarity-driven generalization at scale, showing how models that represent similar languages similarly generalize better from one language to another.
Cross-lingual probe transfer and direct comparison of probe weights show that NLI representations are most alignable in the middle layers: probes transfer best there, and probes trained independently on different languages converge to similar weight vectors, peaking mid-network.
A large-scale empirical study across a diverse set of embedding models and 275+ languages spanning three parallel datasets, exposing persistent gaps in cross-lingual semantic representation that track language prevalence in training resources and subword tokenization.
Andrianos Michail, Stylianos Psychias, Michelle Wastl et al.· 0 citations
This work identifies a curse of ambiguity: in large language models, and more broadly in all neural networks that produce discrete probability distributions, the more ambiguous a next-token distribution is, the harder it is to learn accurately.
Nicolas Zucchet, Hyun Dong Lee, Scott W. Linderman· 0 citations
This work presents the first systematic study of inverse relation directionality in LLMs, using a benchmark consisting of 5,457 instances spanning 27 distinct inverse relation labels and reveals systematic asymmetries in inverse relation classification across LLMs.
A scale-dependent transition between two ID regimes is found: at low lexical diversity, conditions with fewer unique final words produce higher ID, while at high lexical diversity, this ordering reverses, and conditions with more unique words produce higher ID.
Arwa Osman, Marco Baroni, Iuri Macocco· 0 citations
This work proposes a simple tokenizer-level intervention based on language cues: language-specific characters replacing initial characters of shared-vocabulary words, reducing common identity during vocabulary construction, and suggests that adding lightweight language information at the tokenizer level is a promising direction for further exploration.