Skip to content

Clinical investigation of the iHealth Track KN-550BT upper-arm blood pressure monitor in pregnant patients according to the ISO 81060-2:2018+AMD1:2020/AMD2:2024.

Aug 2026 · Blood Pressure Monitoring · 0 citations · 9 references
Medicine

TL;DR

The iHealth Track KN-550BT upper-arm oscillometric upper-arm automated BP monitor fully complies with the requirements of ISO 81060-2:2018+AMD1:2020/AMD2:2024, and can be recommended for clinical application and home self-BP measurement among pregnant patients.

Abstract

Objective

Validation of blood pressure (BP) devices is essential for reliable BP detection in pregnant populations. This study, therefore, set out to assess the measurement performance of the iHealth Track KN-550BT oscillometric upper-arm automated BP monitor for pregnant patients with the standard International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 81060-2:2018+AMD1:2020/AMD2:2024.

Methods

This validation study enrolled a total of 45 pregnant patients. All BP measurements were performed sequentially on the left arm using the ISO unified standardized protocol. Device-reference discrepancies between the tested automated sphygmomanometer and the mercury sphygmomanometer were calculated and evaluated in strict accordance with the ISO standard specifications.

Results

The study cohort consisted of 15 normotensive pregnant patients, 15 patients with gestational hypertension, and 15 patients diagnosed with preeclampsia. For the ISO Validation Criterion 1, the mean differences between the test device and mercury standard were -0.90 ± 4.82 mmHg for SBP and -0.91 ± 4.14 mmHg for DBP, respectively. For Criterion 2, the standard deviations of the averaged per-participant differences between device and reference measurements were 3.95 mmHg for SBP and 3.10 mmHg for DBP, respectively.

Conclusion

The iHealth Track KN-550BT upper-arm oscillometric automated BP monitor fully complies with the requirements of ISO 81060-2:2018+AMD1:2020/AMD2:2024, and can be recommended for clinical application and home self-BP measurement among pregnant patients.

View source

Similar papers

Aug 2026

Validation of the Arm-Type Fully Automatic Blood Pressure Monitor DBP-62F4B-P in adolescents and adults according to the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation/European Society of Hypertension/International Organization for Standardization (ISO 81060-2:2018+Amd 2:2024) standard.

The Arm-Type Fully Automatic Blood Pressure Monitor (model: DBP-62F4B-P) meets the accuracy and consistency requirements of the AAMI/ESH/ISO standard for SBP and DBP measurement in adolescents and adults with arm circumference 22.0-42.0 cm and is suitable for home use based on its design features and validation performance.

Xiaojin Guo · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

Continuous BP monitoring of ICU Taiwanese patients: training-phase evaluation of oCare™ BP100 according to ISO 81060-3: 2022

It is demonstrated that a training-phase evaluation of Type T mode continuous automated non-invasive sphygmomanometer repeated SBP, DBP, and MAP measurement of oCare™ BP100 in Type T mode are stable across various analysis periods and patients.

Chao-Lun Lai, Yeh-Wen Lee, Chia-Fang Chang et al. · 0 citations
Jul 2026

Validation of the Microlife WatchBP O3 (BP3SZ1-1) upper-arm, oscillometric blood pressure device in pregnancy according to ISO 81060-2:2018.

The Microlife WatchBP O3 upper-arm, oscillometric BP device passed the criteria of the ISO 81060-2:2018 standard in normotensive pregnant women, women with gestational hypertension, and women with pre-eclampsia.

A. de Greeff, Catherine A Cluver, A. Shennan · 0 citations
#software testing Open access Aug 2026

Evaluation of Alysis-001 cuffless blood pressure estimation algorithm against the European Society of Hypertension awake/asleep test criteria in hypertensive patients.

This represents the first evaluation of a Device Type 3 cuffless blood pressure algorithm (automated, wearable, demographic-calibrated, not at heart level) meeting ESH awake/asleep test criteria, suggesting Alysis-001's potential as a clinically viable alternative for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in hypertensive patients.

Kazuhiro Hongyo, Atsushi Hirayama, Kosuke Shimizu et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Wearable, cuffless, and portable devices for blood pressure monitoring (2015–2025): a scoping review of technologies, calibration, clinical validation, and regulatory frameworks

The 2015–2025 ecosystem shows rapid progress and a transition toward cuffless-specific validation, however, clinical utility depends on intended use, population, calibration/recalibration, and setting, and performance should not be extrapolated across technologies, populations, or contexts.

J. C. Bustamante-Rodríguez, Jhosmer Ballena-Caicedo, Julio César Bautista-Zuta et al. · 0 citations