Skip to content
Open access

Patient-level reclassification and discordance between SOFA and SOFA-2: a multicenter ICU study

Aug 2026 · Critical Care · Vol 30 · 1 citation · ⚡ 1 influential · 37 references
Medicine

TL;DR

SOFA and SOFA-2 may provide overlapping but complementary information for assessing organ dysfunction severity, and patients assigned the same severity by one scoring system remained heterogeneous in mortality according to the other scoring system.

Abstract

The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score is widely used to quantify organ dysfunction in critically ill patients. A revised version, SOFA-2, was proposed to better reflect contemporary intensive care practice, but patient-level reclassification and the implications of differences between SOFA and SOFA-2 remain unclear. We conducted a retrospective multicenter cohort study using the OneICU database, a Japanese ICU registry including 15 hospitals. Adult ICU admissions between April 2012 and December 2025 were analyzed. Day-1 SOFA and SOFA-2 scores were calculated. Reclassification patterns were visualized using Sankey diagrams, and mortality patterns were assessed using heat maps. Score discordance was defined as SOFA deviation (dSOFA = SOFA-2 − SOFA) and categorized as Negative ( ≤ − 2), Minimal ( > − 2 and < 2), or Positive (≥ 2). Two primary exact-matching analyses were performed across dSOFA categories, separately matching patients on Day-1 SOFA-2 and conventional SOFA total scores. Among 134,528 ICU admissions, SOFA-2 resulted in systematic patient-level reclassification. Upward shifts were most frequent in the brain, cardiovascular, and respiratory subscores, whereas the kidney subscore showed bidirectional changes. Mortality increased with higher SOFA-2 subscores at fixed SOFA and with higher SOFA subscores at fixed SOFA-2. After exact matching on SOFA-2, mortality was highest in the Negative dSOFA group, in which SOFA was higher than SOFA-2. Conversely, after exact matching on conventional SOFA, mortality was highest in the Positive dSOFA group, in which SOFA-2 was higher than SOFA. SOFA-2 introduces systematic reclassification at the patient level. Reciprocal exact-matching analyses demonstrated that patients assigned the same severity by one scoring system remained heterogeneous in mortality according to the other scoring system. SOFA and SOFA-2 may therefore provide overlapping but complementary information for assessing organ dysfunction severity.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Sep 2026

Implications of different SOFA score variants for outcome prediction in emergency department patients with an infection: a multicenter cohort study.

BACKGROUND The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score estimates mortality risk and ICU admission in Emergency Department (ED) patients with infection, but not all parameters are routinely available outside the ICU. Several adaptations have been proposed, yet their impact on prognostic performance remains uncl...

T. J. van der Aart, Carolina Hincapié-Osorno, Isaac Santiago Arango-Gil et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Prognostic value of the Day-21 SOFA-2 score in patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation: A 10-year retrospective experience in a university-affiliated tertiary hospital.

BACKGROUND Patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation (PMV, ≥21 days) face poor long-term outcomes. The widely used ProVent 21 score relies on categorical variables that may not capture continuous multi-organ dysfunction. The updated SOFA-2 score simplifies neurological assessment, but its prognostic value at...

Wanho Yoo, Hyojin Jang, Harin Rhee et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Predictive value of admission SOFA scores for ICU mortality: A single-centre study from a South African tertiary hospital

Background. The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score was initially developed as a tool to quantify the degree of organ dysfunction in patients with sepsis. It is now a commonly used severity-of-illness score across a variety of settings. Although the SOFA score is versatile and simple, it has not been well...

D. Naidoo, K. de Vasconcellos · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Prognostic discrimination of SOFA-2 vs. SOFA-1 and incremental information from cardiovascular scoring and vasoactive support intensity in patients with sepsis receiving early vasoactive therapy

Background Patients with sepsis who require vasoactive support during the first 24 h of intensive care represent a heterogeneous population. It is uncertain whether the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA)-2 score improves mortality discrimination compared with the SOFA-1 score and whether observed circulatory su...

Tian-Ci Huang, Ming-Yuan Pan, Li-Fan Pan et al. · 0 citations
Open access Jan 2026

Comparative Prognostic Performance of qSOFA and SOFA in Emergency Department Patients With Established Septic Shock

Background The quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) enables rapid bedside screening, whereas sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) offers a more comprehensive evaluation of organ dysfunction; their comparative prognostic value in established septic shock remains unclear. Objective To compare the progn...

Xue Liu, Hua-Jie Zhang, Qi-Rong He · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Multicenter validation of longitudinal SOFA-based prognostic models for ICU triage during scarcity in mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients

The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the need for evidence-based allocation of scarce intensive care unit (ICU) resources during periods of extreme capacity strain. Although age-based criteria have been proposed as a last resort non-medical allocation strategy in crises, incorporating longitudinal changes in a patie...

Thom J. Wilbers, J. de Kok, Mike Zwartkruis et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.