Skip to content
Preprint

Beyond What Meets the Eye: Unveiling Situational Illusions for Multimodal Large Language Models

Aug 2026 · 0 citations · 25 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

This paper develops a comprehensive where-what-how taxonomy that characterizes where situational illusions occur, what targets they take, and how they arise, and introduces MSIBench, a benchmark designed to assess the discrimination, understanding, and reasoning capabilities of MLLMs under situational illusions.

Abstract

Real-world situation appearances can deviate from their underlying physical states, challenging the reliability of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) in practical applications. In this paper, we term this phenomenon situational illusions and investigate: (1) how MLLMs perform under such illusions, and (2) how to mitigate the limitations. We first develop a comprehensive where-what-how taxonomy that characterizes where situational illusions occur, what targets they take, and how they arise. Building on this taxonomy, we introduce MSIBench, a benchmark designed to assess the discrimination, understanding, and reasoning capabilities of MLLMs under situational illusions. Evaluations of 27 model configurations reveal that current MLLMs are highly vulnerable to these illusions and exhibit 6 typical failure modes related to visual observation, grounding, and reasoning. To mitigate the limitations, we build on the core idea of systematically inspecting and reasoning over visual evidence for contextual understanding, developing prompting for closed-source models and supervised fine-tuning for open-source models, respectively. These two simple yet effective methods improve model performances by 20% at most, suggesting a practical path toward more reliable multimodal perception and reasoning in complex real-world environments.

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Sep 2026

What Do Hallucinations Reveal About Multimodal Reasoning? Diagnosing Visual Grounding Failures via Contrastive Decoding Probes

When strong multimodal models are widely available, progress requires new scientific methodologies beyond benchmark scores---using models as instruments for understanding behavior. We address this by asking: can we use large vision-language models (LVLMs) as experimental instruments for studying their own failure dynam...

Zhi-Peng Zhao, Wen-Xu Wang, Peishun Liu et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

PragMatch: Separating Pragmatic Incongruity from Cross-Modal Mismatch in Large Vision-Language Models

The results show that LVLM predictions are sensitive to lexical, OCR-derived and stylistic cues, with injected surface signals causing substantial changes in model predictions despite unchanged underlying image-text relationships.

Zhanna Mukhametsharip, Vera Demberg, Varsha Suresh Saarland University et al. · 0 citations
2026

A Draft-Ground-Verify-Revise Framework for Reducing Hallucination in Large Language Models

Large language models (LLMs) often generate fluent but factually unsupported or logically invalid text: failure modes broadly referred to as hallucination. A variety of approaches have been proposed to mitigate hallucination, ranging from careful benchmark design, preference modeling, and fine-tuning (e.g., RLHF) to po...

Syed Mubashir · 0 citations
#computer vision Preprint Aug 2026

LookBack: Where and How to Score LVLM Responses via Visual Reference Usage

LookBack, a training-free LVLM response scoring method that augments token likelihood with visual lookback score, a lightweight measure of how strongly each response token refers to image tokens, consistently improves Best-of-$N$ selection over existing baselines with negligible additional overhead.

Beomsik Cho, Jin-Ha Kim, Dongseok Lee et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Towards Trustworthy Large Language Models

An integrated conceptual frame-work that couples attention- and perturbation-based explainability with lightweight hallucination-detection signals and token-efficient inference strategies is presented, and a set of cross-cutting consistency metrics are instrumented with a set of cross-cutting consistency metrics.

Sakshi Parate, Shreyans Sanyal · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Beneath the Scores: Rethinking Hallucination Evaluation for Video Understanding Models

A causal stage-intervention protocol that overwrites individual stages while holding the downstream task fixed is introduced, finding that grounding is the dominant source of downstream error, with roughly four times the causal impact of corrupting visual observations.

Shu-Zhi Gong, F. Sun, Yuansan Liu · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.