ChronoLens is introduced, a framework that combines frozen multilingual language models, feature-aligned crosscoders, and post-hoc linguistic interventions, and applies it to 44.98 million documents and approximately 17.2 billion tokens from five parliamentary traditions spanning 1803--2026, showing that historical language change is a structured, multidimensional process.
Abstract
Historical language change affects morphology, syntax, semantics, and pragmatics, yet computational studies typically examine these levels with incompatible representations and therefore cannot determine whether they evolve together across languages. We address this problem by asking how the magnitude and direction of change vary across linguistic levels, languages, and historical periods within a single analytical space. We introduce ChronoLens, a framework that combines frozen multilingual language models, feature-aligned crosscoders, and post-hoc linguistic interventions, and apply it to 44.98 million documents and approximately 17.2 billion tokens from five parliamentary traditions spanning 1803--2026. The resulting sparse representations agree substantially more strongly with linguistic statistics than dense embeddings or a pooled sparse autoencoder ($\rho=0.72$ versus $0.29$ and $0.28$), and reveal that morphology, syntax, semantics, and pragmatics generally change by comparable amounts within a language, while languages differ markedly in when, how far, and in which direction they change. These findings show that historical language change is a structured, multidimensional process: similar magnitudes can conceal different trajectories, and meaningful cross-linguistic comparison requires measuring both distance and direction.
Multilingual large language models often generalize across languages, and prior work suggests that their internal mechanisms can overlap cross-lingually. It remains unclear, however, when such sharing emerges and whether it varies with the overt realization of the same grammatical operation. We investigate this questio...
Isabella Gidi, Antonio Almudévar, C. Park et al.· 0 citations
It is argued that collapsing cultural competence into a single scalar incentivizes "probabilistic flattening," and that recognizing the unalignable class is a precondition for AI that respects, rather than erases, cultural divergence.
It is shown that translation is even more modular than previously assumed and that the output language production in translation processes is actually further separable into a syntax and a surface language process.
M. Sonkin, Tanja Baeumel, Daniil Gurgurov et al.· 0 citations
Real-world communication often requires pragmatic reasoning: interpreting meanings implied through context and cultural convention rather than stated literally. Existing pragmatic evaluation remains largely limited to English and high-resource languages, leaving Indic languages unexplored despite their linguistic and c...
Claims about the grammatical competence of multilingual language models vary sharply with how competence is measured, yet the interaction between evaluation paradigm, post-training, and language resource availability has not been systematically examined. We evaluate base and post-trained models from six families on Mul...
A controlled evaluation framework for multilingual natural language inference that stress-tests semantic consistency using synthetic logic-based premise–hypothesis pairs in both monolingual and code-switched conditions is presented.
Unknown authors· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.