PARTAB (Partition-Aware Reasoning overTables), a framework that constructs a structured evidence interface between the LLM and the table, demonstrates the value of structured, partition aware evidence construction for scalable table reasoning.
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown strong capabilities in table reasoning, but their effectiveness degrades as tables grow in size and complexity due to irrelevant context and difficulty localizing the evidence required for reasoning. Existing approaches typically reason over either the full table or a single reduced view, which can still obscure important row-column relationships. We introducePARTAB (Partition-Aware Reasoning overTables), a framework that constructs a structured evidence interface between the LLM and the table. PARTAB represents query-relevant evidence as semantically coherent, row-linked table regions and performs hierarchical selection over column groups and row-level partitions before composing the selected evidence for answer generation. We evaluate PARTAB on multiple table reasoning benchmarks, covering question answering, fact verification, and numerical reasoning. PARTAB consistently improves over full-table prompting and several recent table reasoning methods, achieving strong performance on WikiTableQuestions and TabFact while remaining competitive on numerical reasoning. Additional analyses show that semantic partitioning and targeted evidence selection improve evidence localization, substantially reduce the reasoning context, and provide larger benefits on complex tables. These results demonstrate the value of structured, partition aware evidence construction for scalable table reasoning.
Experiments on WikiTQ and SLQA show that localization is particularly effective for lookup and local reasoning questions, while adaptive selection between localized and full-table reasoning achieves the best overall performance, highlighting that long-table QA requires deciding not only how to localize, but also when t...
TKFQA, a factuality consistency benchmark comprising 10,130 question-answering (QA) pairs grounded in tables, texts, and knowledge graphs, is introduced and ORLF, an LLM-agnostic training framework that models cross-context topological relations through knowledge-specific latent vectors is proposed.
Shibo Chu, Yu-Ze Liu, Tie-Hua Zhang et al.· 0 citations
GRS-QA is introduced, a reasoning graph-structured question answering dataset that augments multi-hop QA instances from exisiting datasets, with directed reasoning graphs representing intermediate inference steps, and highlights the importance of unified structural annotations for understanding and improving multi-hop...
Khin S. Yone, Devasha Trivedi, Anish Pahilajani et al.· International Conference on...· 0 citations
This paper proposes DocTrace, a hierarchical framework that progressively performs evidence localization, structured document parsing, and evidence graph reasoning to enable explicit evidence provenance, and develops a two-stage training framework.
Lei Xiang, Zhi-Cheng Guan, Hong Chen et al.· 0 citations
A scale-aware comparative study of reasoning enhancement for SLMs across three major families of methods: prompting-based reasoning, retrieval-based augmentation, and knowledge graph guided scaffolding shows that reasoning-enhancement strategies are not universally transferable across model scales under the evaluated s...
Zhen-Zhen Gu, Jie Liu, Xian Liu· Journal of King Saud Univers...· 0 citations
This work introduces DocHop, a benchmark for integrated chart--context reasoning in document-style images and constructs DocHop via a stochastic logic-first generation pipeline with controllable reasoning depth and visual density, to enable systematic evaluation.
Zhuo-Ran Yu, Le Thien Phuc Nguyen, Jaden Park et al.· 1 citation
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.