Jul 2026· Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media· Vol 145, pp. 65-71· 0 citations
TL;DR
It is argued that AIGC platforms do not simply de-professionalise or decentralise creation, but it also obscures the continuing value of professional expertise and widen entry while re-concentrating key forms of production, distribution, and definitional power.
Abstract
This article examines the platform-creator dyadic relationship that has taken shape around generative AI visual media. Rather than asking only whether AIGC (Artificial Intelligence Generated Content) lowers the technical threshold of image and video production, it asks how platforms rearrange Internet communication power through infrastructure, algorithms, data capture, and visibility allocation. Drawing on Manuel Castells's theory of communication power, the study develops a three-part account of production power, distribution power, and definitional power in AIGC platforms. The analysis combines theoretical interpretation, public platform cases, and practice-based observation. It argues that AIGC platforms do not simply de-professionalise or decentralise creation. Their low-threshold rhetoric invites ordinary users into visual production, but it also obscures the continuing value of professional expertise. Platform control over models, credits, computing resources, and interfaces then turns creative capacity into a conditionally accessible service. Algorithmic black boxes and traffic recommendation systems further shape how works circulate, are evaluated, and acquire value. AIGC platforms therefore widen entry while re-concentrating key forms of production, distribution, and definitional power. The study offers a cautious framework for creators, platform observers, and scholars of communication power.
This introduction provides an overview of the fifteen papers accepted to the Communication, Digital Conversation, and Media Technologies minitrack of HICSS 2026, and charts how platforms, publics, and producers co-create contemporary communication.
Seth C. Lewis, Gina M. Masullo, Y. Kalman· 0 citations
It is demonstrated that platform guidelines are disciplinary technologies translating cold code into behavioral norms, which proves digital power is enforced through strategic corporate language, reshaping how the authors understand digital subjectivity and creative labor governance within contemporary digital media ec...
M. Muchtar, Y. Riani· Jurnal the Messenger· 0 citations
Analytical questions for tracing who determines the "legibility" of culture, whose interpretations spread, and how platforms reinforce certain meanings while marginalising others are put forward.
Cheng-Rui Shi· Journal of Humanities and Cu...· 0 citations
This study shows AI enables a cohort of “Internet entrepreneurs” to enter cultural production, driven by a “money hustling culture” that encourages formerly idle and low-skilled individuals to pursue rapid monetisation.
Jiaru Tang, Xiaoting Yu, Patrik Wikström et al.· AI & SOCIETY· 0 citations
The paper conceptualizes co-intelligence as the combination of AI's analytical capacity with human empathy, ethics, and strategic insight, which distinguishes it from existing constructs such as hybrid intelligence, intelligence augmentation, and human-in-the-loop systems by specifying its organizational and governance...
M. Mallek, Riadh Jeljeli, Faycal Farhi et al.· Frontiers in Communication· 1 citation
The research refines dual-process theories within digital information management by specifying a measurable, sequential association pattern for observable engagement under information density, and distinguishes Audience Conversion Efficacy as a critical moderator.
Jun Xu, Yuying Luo, Chengliang Wang et al.· Aslib Journal of Information...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.