This structured narrative review synthesizes AI applications across four sequential stages of the hydraulic-fracturing workflow: sweet-spot identification, fracturing-parameter optimization, operational diagnosis and risk warning, and post-fracturing flowback prediction and control.
Abstract
Hydraulic fracturing is a critical technology for unconventional oil and gas development, but its performance is strongly affected by geological heterogeneity, complex fracture propagation, operational uncertainty, and nonlinear interactions among engineering parameters. Artificial intelligence (AI) provides tools for extracting relationships from geological, geophysical, operational, and production data. This structured narrative review synthesizes AI applications across four sequential stages of the hydraulic-fracturing workflow: sweet-spot identification, fracturing-parameter optimization, operational diagnosis and risk warning, and post-fracturing flowback prediction and control. Representative studies reported sweet-spot classification accuracy of 97.5% and R2 = 0.97 for production-performance prediction; a simulator-coupled optimization study reported a 13% economic improvement, and field-data models used cohorts of up to 295 wells. Operational studies reported point-event recognition above 97%, pressure forecasting 30 s ahead, and risk forecasts over three consecutive 60 s intervals. A post-fracturing model trained on 286 wells predicted responses over 30-, 90-, 180-, and 360-day horizons. These values are study-specific and are not directly comparable because the datasets, targets, partitions, and metrics differ. Collectively, the evidence indicates measurable but uneven progress; field readiness remains limited by data quality, multimodal alignment, physical consistency, uncertainty quantification, external validation, and weak coupling between model outputs and operational decisions. The review contributes a reproducible workflow-oriented coding framework and defines validation and deployment priorities for reliable, interpretable, and executable AI-assisted fracturing decision support.
Real-time regulation of fracturing pumping parameters and risk early warning are critical technologies for improving the development efficiency of shale oil and gas reservoirs while ensuring operational safety. Conventional fracturing operations primarily rely on static design and manual control, which suffer from de...
Lei Hou, Hao Zeng, Jiu-Jie Cai et al.· Energy & Fuels· 0 citations
Hydraulic fracturing is critical process in unconventional reservoir development, where accurate real time monitoring directly impacts operational safety, job efficiency and financial aspect. This study presents a hybrid framework integrating domain specific operational thresholds with supervised machine learning for a...
Driven by global carbon neutrality targets, coal-fired power generation is undergoing substantial operational changes. Modern boilers must operate more flexibly while maintaining low emissions and reliable performance. This transition has increased the need for intelligent monitoring, operator-supervised optimization,...
Rui Luo, Jun-Bo Yu, Na Li et al.· Applied Sciences· 0 citations
Effective oil reservoir management aims to maximize profit by navigating operational, technological, economic, and regulatory constraints. This management is inherently linked with production infrastructure and spans the entire reservoir life cycle — from exploration and production to revitalization. To streamline rese...
Sérgio F. A. Batista, A. Santos, J. R. Bertini· Computational Geosciences· 0 citations
The application of this AI inspired workflow improves the efficiency and efficacy of the team with resource quantification and investment decisions and creates a framework that generates repeatable and consistent results that can be used across teams and basins.
Qin Lu, J. Daal, L. Mcauliffe et al.· SPE Permian Basin Energy Con...· 0 citations
This study proposes an intelligent prediction method for oil-based drilling fluid rheology by integrating an automated machine learning (AutoML) framework with Shapley additive explanations (SHAP), and shows that funnel viscosity, drilling fluid density, and solids content were the dominant factors controlling rheologi...
Jin-Tao Weng, Jian-Long Wang, Ren Wang et al.· SPE Journal· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.