Skip to content
Review Open access

Second-line therapy in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: an unmet need highlighted by real-world evidence from the LALUCA registry.

Sep 2026 · Lung Cancer · Vol 221, pp. 109639 · 0 citations · 39 references
Medicine

Abstract

Background

Extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) has a dismal prognosis as patients progress within months after first-line systemic treatment. Until recently, topotecan was the only approved second-line treatment in Europe. However, due to its limited efficacy, various treatment strategies are being employed. This study aimed to depict the therapeutic landscape of second-line treatment in ES-SCLC and to evaluate survival outcomes in a real-world setting.

Methods

Data from the Austrian LALUCA registry, a prospective, multicenter clinical lung cancer registry, were reviewed for all patients diagnosed with ES-SCLC between November 2020 and October 2025. Clinical and treatment characteristics were assessed with special emphasis to second-line treatment. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and time to next treatment (TTNT).

Results

Among 203 patients with histologically confirmed ES-SCLC included in this study, 75 patients (36.9%) received second-line therapy. The main reason for no second-line treatment (n = 128) at data cut-off was death in 49.2% and switch to best supportive care in 18.8%. Second-line treatment consisted of anthracycline-based treatment regimens in 57.3%, topotecan in 26.7% and re-challenge of platinum-based chemo- or chemoimmunotherapy in 16.0% of patients. The median duration of second-line treatment was 2 months (range: 0.0-8.2) with a median PFS of 4.7 months (95% CI: 3.9, 5.8), and median OS of 7.1 months (95% CI: 5.1, 9.3). The median TTNT between first- and second-line treatment was 6.4 months (range: 0.3 - 38.7). The main reasons for treatment discontinuation were disease progression in 30.7%, followed by completed regimen in 24.0% and death in 13.3%.

Conclusion

This real-world analysis shows poor outcomes in patients with progressing ES-SCLC, reflected by both short median PFS and duration of second-line treatment, along with high rates of treatment discontinuation due to progression, highlighting the urgent need for more effective and tolerable treatment options.

Read PDF

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.