This study demonstrates that translating predictive models into clinical practice requires integration within real-world workflows, transparent presentation of information, and design aligned with the cognitive and operational realities of perioperative care.
Abstract
Abstract Objectives This study aimed to design and evaluate the usability of an electronic health record (EHR)-integrated clinical decision support prototype supporting pediatric surgical site infection (SSI) risk estimation and preoperative optimization using a multiphase human-centered design approach. Methods We conducted a three-phase study at a quaternary pediatric academic health system involving clinicians from anesthesia and seven surgical specialties. Phase 1 used contextual inquiry to examine preoperative information gathering, infection risk assessment, and coordination workflows to define user needs. Phase 2 used structured mock-up design review sessions to refine interface design and establish prototype requirements. Phase 3 involved formative usability testing of an interactive prototype using a think-aloud approach, followed by the Healthcare Systems Usability Scale (HSUS). Qualitative data were analyzed using thematic analysis. HSUS scores were analyzed descriptively. Results Nine clinicians participated in each phase (10 total participants). Contextual inquiry identified challenges including manual chart review burden, task coordination outside the EHR, and largely qualitative risk assessment practices. Design review translated these needs into a centralized preoperative workspace integrating patient summaries, contextualized SSI risk with contributing factors and benchmarks, and role-based task tracking. During usability testing, clinicians reported reduced chart review burden and better visibility of high-priority information, while identifying opportunities to improve visual prioritization, transparency of risk logic and recommendations, and mechanisms to correct or flag inaccurate content. HSUS results indicated good to excellent usability, with an overall usability score of 80%. Workflow integration received the highest ratings (90%), followed by patient safety and decision effectiveness (86%). Conclusion This study demonstrates that translating predictive models into clinical practice requires integration within real-world workflows, transparent presentation of information, and design aligned with the cognitive and operational realities of perioperative care. These findings provide a foundation for iterative refinement, implementation, and prospective evaluation of EHR-integrated pediatric SSI decision support.
A user-centered design (UCD) approach was applied to iteratively evaluate and inform improvements to an ePRO system designed for post-discharge thoracic surgery care, incorporating perspectives of patient, caregiver, and provider end-users.
E. Kwong, Meghan C. O'Leary, Amanda L. Gentry et al.· Journal of Surgical Research· 0 citations
OBJECTIVES
Human Factors (HF) principles are essential for safe and effective clinical decision support (CDS), yet existing guidance is fragmented and rarely evaluated in real world settings. A novel, evidence-based, vendor-agnostic HF-informed guideline was developed to address this gap. This study evaluated its perce...
Selvana Awad, Thomas Loveday, Andrew J. Baillie et al.· JAMIA Journal of the America...· 0 citations
This study evaluated a user-centered clinical dashboard using FHIR-Server data to improve information accessibility for physicians treating melanoma patients. Current electronic health record systems distribute critical information across multiple modules and prioritize billing and research over clinical decision-makin...
E. Hartmann, Katarzyna Borys, A. Idrissi-Yaghir et al.· Scientific Reports· 0 citations
This is one of the first EHR-integrated electronic COPD questionnaires developed through structured patient co-design and qualitative evaluation, providing a transferable model for tools that inform clinical decision support.
A. Kouri, Zoe Garzouzi, A. Chudyk et al.· International Journal of COP...· 0 citations
Abstract Objective: We evaluated usability of a web-based clinical decision support tool designed to support antibiotic stewardship by helping clinicians differentiate asymptomatic bacteriuria from true urinary tract infections. Design: Mixed methods usability evaluation with qualitative think-aloud sessions and survey...
Yosef Chernet, M. Politi, Viktoria Vonder Haar et al.· Antimicrobial Stewardship an...· 0 citations
Background Guideline-based clinical decision support (CDS) tools have become central to promoting evidence-based, high-quality primary care. Despite widespread implementation, clinician adoption and sustained use remain inconsistent. Existing research has typically examined technological usability or organizational imp...
Purvi Mehta, P. Rangachari, Alvin Tran et al.· Journal of Healthcare Leader...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.