Skip to content
Review Open access

Multimodal Management of Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension: A Narrative Review of Treatment Selection and Sequencing

Sep 2026 · Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease · Vol 13 · 0 citations · 69 references
Medicine

Abstract

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a treatable yet frequently underdiagnosed late complication of acute pulmonary embolism, in which incompletely resolved thromboemboli organise into fibrotic obstructions of the pulmonary arteries and, together with a secondary small-vessel arteriopathy affecting both obstructed and non-obstructed territories, raise pulmonary vascular resistance, impose right ventricular pressure overload, and—if left untreated—progress to right heart failure and death. Three established therapies address the disease at distinct anatomical levels: pulmonary endarterectomy, the potentially curative treatment of choice for surgically accessible disease; balloon pulmonary angioplasty, for distal inoperable lesions or residual disease; and pulmonary hypertension-targeted medical therapy, for the accompanying microvasculopathy. Their evaluation in randomised controlled trials and large registries has produced a multimodal paradigm in which these treatments are combined and sequenced according to operability and lesion distribution. This narrative review synthesises evidence published through January 2026 to accomplish the following: (i) summarise and critically appraise the contemporary evidence for each modality, distinguishing guideline-supported recommendations from observational, proof-of-concept, and expert-opinion-based practice; (ii) describe how treatments are selected, sequenced, and bridged in relation to operability and to residual or recurrent pulmonary hypertension after endarterectomy; and (iii) situate treatment within the broader chronic thromboembolic pulmonary disease spectrum and the case-finding pathway after pulmonary embolism. Rather than proposing a validated algorithm, it emphasises that, because each modality carries distinct indications and risks, decisions should be individualised through multidisciplinary assessment at expert centres, with early referral central to optimising outcomes.

Read PDF

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.