Skip to content

NeuralBES: A Differentiable, Control-Aware Emulator for Scalable Building Energy Modeling

Oct 2026 · 0 citations · 37 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

On the annual full-year rollout, NeuralBES is the only data-conditioned model that is simultaneously physics-valid and accurate to within 4 MAPE points of the strongest raw-error baseline, while operating at roughly an order of magnitude fewer parameters than the transformer and recurrent baselines.

Abstract

Demand-side flexibility i.e. forecasting, shifting, and curtailing residential energy loads, depends on thermal models trusted across millions of heterogeneous buildings. Existing tools force a hard tradeoff: high-fidelity physics simulators such as EnergyPlus are accurate but sequential and require per-building calibration, while purely data-driven sequence models scale but abandon the physical structure that makes their predictions trustworthy. We introduce NeuralBES (Building Energy Simulation), a differentiable emulator that resolves this tradeoff by parameterizing a resistance--capacitance (RC) based thermal model with a shared neural encoder: static building metadata such as floor area, vintage, and HVAC type is mapped to physically bounded capacitances, conductances, and equipment coefficients, which become the coefficients of a scalar linear recurrence solved via a log-space parallel scan, and a predictor--corrector loop closes the thermostat--temperature nonlinearity while preserving full-horizon gradient flow. Trained on the ResStock dataset across three climate zones, NeuralBES handles heterogeneous building archetypes, vintages, and climate zones within a single trained encoder, while black-box baselines produce statistically plausible but physically inconsistent trajectories. On the annual full-year rollout, NeuralBES is the only data-conditioned model that is simultaneously physics-valid and accurate to within 4 MAPE points of the strongest raw-error baseline, while operating at roughly an order of magnitude fewer parameters than the transformer and recurrent baselines; among physics-valid baselines at parameter parity it more than halves the MAPE of the grey-box RC alternative.

View source

Similar papers

Open access Sep 2026

Model-Based Reinforcement Learning for HVAC Energy Optimization Under Hot, Mixed, and Cool Climates

HVAC control trades energy against thermal comfort, complicated by two building features: thermal mass spreads a setpoint change over hours, and the input-to-outcome mapping shifts across the year. Model-free algorithms such as PPO, SAC, and TD3 carry no model of building dynamics and cannot evaluate a setpoint’s downs...

Cheng-Nan Lu, Jinho Park · 0 citations
Conference Aug 2026

Surrogate-Assisted Deep Reinforcement Learning for Commercial HVAC Optimal Control Considering Thermal Inertia

Commercial buildings can provide operational flexibility through HVAC control because thermal inertia enables short-term load shifting under time-of-use (TOU) electricity pricing. However, direct reinforcement learning interaction with a high-fidelity building simulator is computationally expensive and may generate und...

Jia-Xuan Luo, Sheng Chen, Hui-Ling Su et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Physics-Informed Decoupled Machine Learning for Context-Aware EV Range Optimization and Multi-Objective Driver Advisory

This study presents a physics-informed decoupled machine learning framework integrated with a multi-objective Pareto Human–Machine Interface (HMI) advisory system that dynamically balances range extension against passenger thermal discomfort to deliver actionable driver recommendations.

M. Mądziel, Tiziana Campisi · 0 citations
Review Open access 2026

AI-Driven Integrated Energy Systems: Emerging Trends, Research Gaps, and Global Roadmap

The review offers a state-of-the-art, comprehensive basis for co-designing algorithms, market designs, and regulatory protections that expedite bankable, real-world AI-IES deployments across various regions worldwide by specifically bridging AI methodologies, storage technologies, and multi-scale planning horizons.

P. Ohiero · 0 citations

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.