Skip to content
Log in
Open access

“Overdependence on algorithms?”: how artificial intelligence ethical leadership can safeguard self-efficacy and spur innovation

Byung‐Jik Kim Yeon-Jun Choi Julak Lee
Jul 2026 · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · 0 citations

TL;DR

It is found that AI dependence does not have a significant direct negative effect on innovative behavior, and inhibits innovation exclusively through a full mediation pathway by eroding employee self-efficacy, indicating that the suppression of innovation is caused not by the technology itself, but by the “deprivation of mastery experiences” that accompanies over-dependence.

Abstract

While the adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) is often heralded as a catalyst for cognitive augmentation, it simultaneously introduces a risk of cognitive offloading that may threaten human agency. Drawing on the human agency perspective of Social Cognitive Theory, this study investigates the paradoxical relationship between AI dependence and employee innovative behavior. We propose a moderated mediation model to explain how the dependence on “proxy agency” (AI dependence) has a reciprocal relationship with “personal agency” (self-efficacy) to influence innovation, and how AI ethical leadership functions as a contextual safeguard. We tested our hypotheses using data collected from 421 full-time employees in South Korea via a three-wave time-lagged research design. The results reveal a counterintuitive mechanism regarding the impact of AI. We found that AI dependence does not have a significant direct negative effect on innovative behavior. Instead, it inhibits innovation exclusively through a full mediation pathway by eroding employee self-efficacy. This indicates that the suppression of innovation is caused not by the technology itself, but by the “deprivation of mastery experiences” that accompanies over-dependence. Furthermore, we found that AI ethical leadership acts as a critical boundary condition. Under high levels of ethical leadership, the agency-eroding effect of AI dependence on self-efficacy was neutralized, thereby sustaining innovative behavior. These findings challenge technological determinism by highlighting the primacy of psychological resources and offer theoretical and practical insights for fostering a symbiotic human-AI relationship in the modern workplace.

DOI Semantic Scholar
Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Jul 2026

“When artificial intelligence (AI) meets perfectionism”: examining how responsible AI influences knowledge exchanges

It is demonstrated that ethical AI encourages knowledge sharing most effectively when synchronized with a supportive, rather than perfectionistic, work culture, and that ethical AI encourages knowledge sharing most effectively when synchronized with a supportive, rather than perfectionistic, work culture.

Byung‐Jik Kim, Yeon-Jun Choi, Julak Lee · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

Unpacking the AI Black Box in HRM: A Serial Mediation Model of Algorithmic Fairness, Trust, and AI Readiness with AI Anxiety as a Functional Predictor

It is shown that AI readiness, rather than emotional trust alone, is the key functional link in the AI-HRM interface, and organizations should move beyond merely auditing algorithmic fairness and focus on developing employees’ cognitive readiness for AI adoption through transparent systems and targeted literacy programs that transform anxiety into proactive digital competence.

Tri Wahyu Wirjawan, Dadang Heri Kusumah, R. Sarah et al. · 0 citations
Conference Jul 2026

From Moral Gatekeeping to Social Autopilot: Revealing the Normative Substitution Paradox in AI Delegation

The rise of agentic AI systems, which are autonomous, proactive, and capable of multi-step task execution, has transformed how individuals interact with intelligent technologies. While these systems promise efficiency and enhanced decisionmaking, they also introduce new ethical vulnerabilities. This study investigates a paradoxical mechanism in AI-assisted academic task delegation: as social acceptance of AI delegation increases, individuals rely less on internal moral regulation. Drawing on Moral Disengagement Theory and Social Norms Theory, we test a normative substitution model using SEM data from 280 European university students and find that subjective norms function as both mediator and moderator, amplifying delegation intentions while reducing the influence of moral disengagement. Shame proneness emerges as a secondary moderator that buffers the normative pull for individuals with strong internal moral emotions. These findings highlight a critical socio-technical risk: proactive AI systems may unintentionally erode moral accountability as their use becomes socially normalized. We discuss implications for responsible agentic AI design, governance, and human-AI collaboration.

Yasser Al Helaly, A. Ashofteh · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

From threat to strength: how AI usage is paradoxically associated with resilience among accounting and finance employees with perceived work meaningfulness as a mediating mechanism

A moderated mediation model is developed in which perceived work meaningfulness acts as the mediator and job complexity serves as the moderator in the relationship between AI usage and employee resilience, showing that AI usage positively predicted employee resilience, and perceived work meaningfulness mediated this relationship.

Yuanyuan Ji, Huaming Wu · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Transforming work or eroding social capital? How reliance on artificial intelligence drives workplace involution

It is proposed that, from employees’ perspective, AI reliance is associated with higher levels of involution through elevated performance expectations and anxiety, and the importance of protecting employee wellbeing, communicating realistic performance expectations, and maintaining workplace social capital when implementing AI in digitally enabled organizations.

Ruochen Huang · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

Navigating The AI-Augmented Workplace: How Digital Leadership and The AMO Framework Impact Job Insecurity and Human-Algorithm Symbiosis

Findings demonstrate that in specific academic settings, professionals bypass psychological trauma (job insecurity) and structural rhetoric (leadership vision), directly translating practical HR interventions (AMO) into effective human-AI collaborations, urging a shift in HR strategy from complex change management to direct capability building.

Erina Rulianti, Ahmad Gunawan, Giri Nurpribadi et al. · 0 citations