2025· Journal of Applied Bioanalysis· Vol 11· 0 citations
TL;DR
An enhanced LIME-based framework tailored for infectious disease modelling that improves explanation stability, feature attribution consistency, and domain relevance is proposed and offers a practical tool for enhancing confidence in AI-assisted public-health interventions.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) models are increasingly used in epidemiology for infectious disease prediction, risk stratification, and outbreak surveillance; however, their limited interpretability remains a major barrier to adoption in public-health decision-making. Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations (LIME) is a widely used technique for explaining black-box predictions, yet its sensitivity to sampling strategies, feature perturbations, and instability across runs restricts its reliability in high-stakes medical contexts. This study proposes an enhanced LIME-based framework tailored for infectious disease modelling that improves explanation stability, feature attribution consistency, and domain relevance. The proposed approach integrates adaptive neighborhood sampling, epidemiologically informed feature grouping, and regularized local surrogate models to produce more coherent and clinically meaningful explanations. Experiments are conducted on multiple infectious disease datasets involving case-incidence prediction and patient-level risk classification, using tree-based and deep-learning models as base predictors. Comparative evaluation against standard LIME demonstrates notable improvements in explanation fidelity, robustness, and alignment with domain expert expectations, while maintaining computational efficiency. Quantitative metrics such as stability indices, faithfulness scores, and perturbation sensitivity are combined with qualitative assessment by public-health professionals to validate interpretability gains. Results indicate that the improved framework provides clearer insight into drivers such as demographic factors, mobility patterns, environmental variables, and clinical indicators, thereby supporting transparent and trustworthy deployment of AI in epidemiological practice. The study contributes to the growing body of explainable AI research by adapting local explanation techniques to the unique requirements of infectious disease modelling and offers a practical tool for enhancing confidence in AI-assisted public-health interventions.
The research explores the transformative impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on healthcare, focusing on its advancements in diagnostics and disease prediction. It traces the evolution of machine learning algorithms from rule‑based systems to sophisticated deep learning techniques, such as CNN for medical imaging and...
Hanan R. Alnjar· International journal of re...· 0 citations
: To mitigate and prevent the negative global impacts of epidemics like COVID-19, humanity urgently requires reliable pandemic models to support containment strategies. This paper reviews recent advances in statistical, traditional machine learning, and deep learning models applied to epidemic forecasting and risk asse...
Zhong-Zhuo Xu· Proceedings of the 1st Inter...· 0 citations
Disease now-casting increasingly relies on non-traditional data, such as online activity, which offer fast, inexpensive insights but are often noisy, unstructured, and influenced by behavioral confounders. Models using search engine data have frequently suffered from overfitting and unstable performance. However, pande...
Sara Mesquita, João Loureiro, Cláudio Haupt Vieira et al.· PLoS ONE· 0 citations
None of the mechanistic or machine-learning approaches anticipates new epidemic waves beyond the training period, underscoring the difficulty of medium-range epidemic forecasting under genuinely held-out conditions.
Pooja Satwani, Sudhir Kumar Mishra· Journal of the Nigerian Soci...· 0 citations
AI Morbidity and Mortality (AI M&M) is intended to complement, rather than replace, model monitoring, patient safety reporting, and regulatory oversight by converting individual AI-in-workflow failures into actionable institutional learning.
Paulius Mui, Dean F. Sittig, Steven Labkoff et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.