Robot-assisted bladder diverticulectomy in adults: a systematic review and pooled analysis of perioperative and functional outcomes
TL;DR
Across these series, RABD was feasible with low reported short-term morbidity in selected patients: no conversions to open surgery were recorded in the studies reporting conversion status, the major-complication rate was low, and symptom scores and post-void residual improved in every series that measured them.
Abstract
Robot-assisted bladder diverticulectomy (RABD) is used for symptomatic acquired bladder diverticula, but evidence is dispersed across small single-centre series and the only dedicated systematic review dates from 2010. We reviewed contemporary perioperative and functional outcomes of RABD. Following a protocol registered on the Open Science Framework (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/54CFT), PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Scopus and Web of Science were searched from inception to 30 August 2026 (initial search June 2026, re-run and broadened for this version), following PRISMA 2020. Eligible studies were original series of five or more adults undergoing robot-assisted bladder diverticulectomy reporting extractable outcomes. Two reviewers independently screened, extracted data and appraised risk of bias with the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist for case series, with third-reviewer adjudication. Binary outcomes were pooled as proportions with Wilson 95% confidence intervals (CI); continuous outcomes were summarised as patient-number-weighted descriptive values, because mixed median/mean reporting and clinical heterogeneity precluded a formal pooled-effect meta-analysis. Twelve studies (146 patients) were included and all outcomes were extracted from the full-text reports. A transperitoneal route was used throughout. There were no conversions to open surgery (0/129; 95% CI 0–2.9%). Major complications (Clavien–Dindo ≥ III) occurred in 3.0% (4/135; 95% CI 1.2–7.4%). Patient-number-weighted descriptive values (combining study-level medians and means, and therefore not a pooled mean) were: operative time 163 min, blood loss 99 mL, length of stay 3.6 days and catheter duration 7.7 days. Symptom scores and post-void residual improved in every reporting series, significantly in five. The single non-randomised comparison with open surgery reported fewer major complications after RABD (5% [1/20] vs. 50% [3/6], p = 0.007), but the open arm comprised only six patients and this finding should not be regarded as comparative evidence. Across these series, RABD was feasible with low reported short-term morbidity in selected patients: no conversions to open surgery were recorded in the studies reporting conversion status, the major-complication rate was low, and symptom scores and post-void residual improved in every series that measured them. A minority of patients had an incidentally detected intradiverticular tumour; oncological outcomes were not an endpoint of this review. Evidence remains limited by small, heterogeneous, mostly retrospective series, so these findings should be read as descriptive; prospective comparative data are warranted.