Skip to content
Preprint

Certified decoding of quantum LDPC codes

Aug 2026 · 2 citations · ⚡ 1 influential · 41 references
Physics Computer Science Mathematics

TL;DR

This work treats degenerate decoding as probabilistic inference in an undirected graphical model: the probability of each logical class is the partition function of an unconstrained, strictly positive Markov random field over the code's check variables, a construction that generalizes the random-bond Ising mapping of the surface code.

Abstract

Quantum low-density parity-check (qLDPC) codes reduce the qubit overhead of fault-tolerant quantum computation by an order of magnitude, but their decoding is harder than its classical counterpart: because many physical errors are equivalent up to stabilizers, the degenerate maximum-likelihood (ML) decoder must compare the probabilities of entire equivalence classes of errors, that is, partition functions, rather than single errors. The workhorse decoder BP+OSD sidesteps degeneracy heuristically and offers no guarantees. We treat degenerate decoding as probabilistic inference in an undirected graphical model: the probability of each logical class is the partition function of an unconstrained, strictly positive Markov random field over the code's check variables, a construction that generalizes the random-bond Ising mapping of the surface code to arbitrary CSS codes and to spacetime decoding with measurement errors and circuit-level noise. On this model we build two decoders. The first estimates all class partition functions by annealed importance sampling with common random numbers and attaches to every decision a certificate of optimality: a paired bootstrap test, or, composed with constant-factor estimators such as WISH, an exact optimality proof. The second is region-based: the Bethe free energy, whose bias cancels between classes, reproduces exact ML decoding on every tested surface-code instance at millisecond cost, and enlarging the regions to elimination clusters makes exact degenerate ML decoding of the [[72,12,6]] bivariate bicycle code feasible. Across surface codes and the bivariate bicycle codes [[72,12,6]] and [[144,12,12]], under code-capacity, phenomenological, and circuit-level noise, the sampling decoder matches or exceeds BP+OSD while certifying the bulk of its decisions, and the certificate flags exactly the syndromes on which any fast decoder should be distrusted.

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Sep 2026

Coherent error threshold for quantum LDPC codes

A key appeal of quantum low-density parity check (qLDPC) codes is their ability to suppress stochastic Pauli noise below nonzero thresholds. Coherent errors are fundamentally different: they produce superpositions of error patterns whose amplitudes can interfere even after syndrome measurement. Rigorous understanding o...

Zhen Han, Yuan-Yuan Zhao, Yi-Jia Xu et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Accelerating A*-Based Algorithms for Decoding Quantum Low-Density Parity-Check Codes

Numerical results demonstrate a substantial reduction in overall decoding complexity while maintaining the logical error rate (LER) of the stand-alone Tesseract.

Lamia Yous, Francisco García Herrero, Mark F. Flanagan · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

Soft decoding for quantum LDPC codes with experimental validation

A soft beam search decoder for quantum low-density parity-check codes that uses internal decoder data as a confidence metric, removing the need for extra computation is introduced.

Arda Aydin, Edwin Tham, Nicolas Delfosse et al. · 1 citation
Preprint Sep 2026

Quantum Message Passing Convergence and Vanishing Block-Error Probability for Random LDPC Codes

The results justify the use of BPQM in the decoding step of DQI and of coding-theoretic algorithms based on Regev's reduction whenever the code is drawn from one of the random LDPC ensembles analyzed here and the induced memoryless symmetric pure-state channel lies in the BPQM success region.

Avijit Mandal, C. Piveteau, J. Renes et al. · 3 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

Proof of a positive coherent-error threshold for topological quantum codes

Threshold analyses of quantum error-correcting codes are well established for stochastic error models, in which errors occur randomly with given probabilities. However, errors in actual devices can also be coherent, such as unwanted $Z$ rotations due to imperfect control, which are not captured by stochastic error mode...

Shiro Tamiya, Masato Koashi · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

Learning unknown stabilizer codes using product measurements

An algorithm that uses random single-qubit measurements to learn the stabilizer generators of any stabilizer code from $N$ copies of stabilizer states in its codespace, requiring no prior knowledge of the code's structure is presented.

Heather Leitch, Sri.S.Tirukkovalluri, Ying-Kai Ouyang · 2 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.