Four closures are developed: three model the Reynolds stress on a realizable tensor basis---a local map, a non-local model transporting the turbulent kinetic energy and recovering the out-of-plane normal stress, and a fourth models the Reynolds force directly, free of the realizability constraint.
Abstract
Data-driven turbulence closures are commonly calibrated by embedding a CFD solver within an inverse procedure that requires a converged flow solution at every optimization iteration, which is fragile and costly. We instead formulate closure identification as a PDE-constrained, data-driven inverse problem within a physics-informed neural network (PINN), and subsequently stabilize the inferred closure for deployment in a numerical solver. This separation eliminates the training cost of repeated CFD solves and associated adjoint or ensemble evaluations, providing substantial flexibility to investigate alternative closure forms. Using this flexibility, we develop four closures: three model the Reynolds stress on a realizable tensor basis---a local map, a non-local model transporting the turbulent kinetic energy and recovering the out-of-plane normal stress, and the same with a learned length scale $\ell$---and a fourth models the Reynolds force $\mathbf{F}=-\nabla\cdot\boldsymbol{\tau}$ directly, free of the realizability constraint. All four are trained across six two-dimensional bluff-body wakes at $Re=10^4$ and deployed frozen in a standard finite-element solver, stabilized primarily by input-gradient smoothing. Under a strict leave-one-shape-out (LOSO) protocol, all four reduce the field errors of a steady SST $k$-$\omega$ baseline, most strongly on the mean velocity. The learned-length-scale closure is most accurate on the stress fields, while the force model generalizes best on the mean velocity and drag (LOSO drag error $\sim 7\%$). The closures also train efficiently on Particle Image Velocimetry data, enabling geometries intractable for DNS.
It is concluded that aligning data-driven methods with physical constraints—and the training objective with deployment—is the path toward reliable, generalizable, and computationally efficient turbulence models for engineering applications.
Jia-Hao Hu, Jun-Ya Yang· The Physics of Fluids· 0 citations
Reduced order modeling provides an efficient alternative to high fidelity simulations for the rapid prediction of fluid flows in many query settings. Among non intrusive approaches, Operator Inference (OpInf) enables the identification of reduced dynamical operators directly from data while preserving a prescribed math...
This work presents NeuralFlowNet, a data-free, physics-informed proof-of-concept framework designed to solve steady Navier-Stokes problems across low- to high-Reynolds-number conditions, and establishes NeuralFlowNet as a reliable framework for future testing of unsteady and more complex simulations.
Jayanga T. Samarasinghe, Luis A. de la Fuente, Laura V. Alvarez· 0 citations
High-resolution flow fields are essential for resolving wake interaction and pressure-coupled unsteady features in bluff-body flows, yet their acquisition from experiments or high-fidelity simulations remains expensive. In dual-cylinder configurations, the interaction between the cylinders can substantially alter the n...
Zhen Zhang, Yu-Tian Cao, Hao-Han Li et al.· The Physics of Fluids· 0 citations
Graph-based surrogate models offer a promising route to accelerate computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations on unstructured meshes. However, their development is limited by the scarcity of benchmark datasets spanning multiple flow regimes and standardized protocols for long-horizon autoregressive prediction. We i...
Théodore Michel, A. Campos, A. Dujardin et al.· 0 citations
Grid-based fluid dynamics solvers routinely struggle with exhaustive meshing demands and ill-posed inverse problems. A practical mesh-free alternative is given by Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) but, applying them to highly elastic Oldroyd-B fluids results in many training failures. The High Weissenberg Number...
Midhuna Suresh, Akanksha Gupta· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.