Findings advance technology adoption and educational technology research by highlighting the interplay of ethical and technical factors in AI adoption, offering practical insights for educators and developers to optimize AI tools for equitable and effective learning.
Abstract
The rapid integration of Generative AI in higher education has transformed teaching and learning, yet limited research explores the factors driving its adoption and impact on academic performance. This study addresses the gap in understanding how ethical principles (fairness, accountability, transparency, accuracy, autonomy) and AI characteristics (perceived anthropomorphism, perceived intelligence) influence students’ use of Generative AI tools and their subsequent academic outcomes. The research aims to develop and test a theoretical model that integrates these factors to explain Generative AI adoption and its effect on perceived academic performance among university students. Data were collected through surveys from 318 students and analyzed via Partial Least Squares-Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Results revealed that accountability, transparency, accuracy, autonomy, perceived anthropomorphism, and perceived intelligence significantly drive Generative AI use, while fairness does not. Generative AI use, in turn, is positively associated with academic performance, explaining 49.9% of its variance. These findings advance technology adoption and educational technology research by highlighting the interplay of ethical and technical factors in AI adoption, offering practical insights for educators and developers to optimize AI tools for equitable and effective learning.
First-year university students’ perceptions of generative AI in academic work are investigated, foregrounding student agency in a Global South context and offering pedagogical and policy implications for responsible AI adoption.
Sharifuzzaman, M. Rahman· Asian Journal of Contemporar...· 0 citations
It is concluded that effective responses to GenAI-related integrity problems should combine policy clarity, pedagogy, AI literacy, and student support rather than relying only on prohibition or software-based surveillance.
A ten-step teaching framework for AI-supported creative interactive content design is proposed, aimed at fostering pedagogical innovation while preserving critical thinking, creativity, and student authorship.
Belén Mainer, Ana Pérez-Escoda· Education sciences· 0 citations
The study highlights the need for ethical training, policies, and clear guidelines to ensure responsible use of GAI, promoting innovation while safeguarding academic values.
H. Albadi· International journal of com...· 0 citations
This study investigates how engineering students’ personality traits, perceived team roles, and AI literacy influence their perceptions of generative Artificial Intelligence (Gen-AI) tools in university education. Building on previous frameworks that link psychological and behavioral variables to technology adoption, a longitudinal design was adopted across two academic years (2023–24 and 2024–25) at the University of Udine. The same validated questionnaire was administered to undergraduate and graduate engineering students, combining the Big Five personality inventory, perceived team-role selection, and five multi-item scales measuring Attitude, Trust, Social Influence, Fairness & Ethics, and Usefulness toward Gen-AI. Descriptive and inferential analyses showed stable perceptions over time, with small yet meaningful increases in Attitude and AI Literacy (p < .05). The mediation analysis indicated that AI literacy acts as a mediator between Openness and perceived Usefulness, although the effect was small and non-significant. The results suggest that continued exposure to Gen-AI fosters both greater confidence and more critical awareness among engineering students. The study provides evidence of the structural reliability of the proposed Excel-based framework and offers practical guidance for integrating AI literacy modules into design-oriented engineering curricula.
S. Filippi, E. Vaglio, Barbara Motyl· AHFE International· 0 citations
This conceptual paper synthesizes insights from ten institutional cases across global contexts and draws on five theoretical foundations, Diffusion of Innovation, the Technology Acceptance Model, Self-Determination Theory, Social Learning Theory, and Academic Integrity frameworks, to propose a process model of AI adoption and use in higher education.