Skip to content
Review Open access

Registered nurses’ experiences with generative artificial intelligence: a meta-synthesis of qualitative studies

Jul 2026 · Frontiers in Public Health · Vol 14 · 0 citations · 38 references
Medicine

TL;DR

Qualitative evidence suggests that registered nurses perceive GAI as a potentially supportive tool for improving efficiency, assisting clinical and research decision-making, and promoting professional development.

Abstract

Objective To synthesize qualitative evidence on registered nurses’ experiences of using generative artificial intelligence (GAI) in clinical practice and nursing research, and to identify perceived benefits, challenges, and support needs for its standardized implementation in nursing. Methods A qualitative meta-synthesis was conducted using the Joanna Briggs Institute meta-aggregation approach. PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, and the China Biomedical Literature Database were searched from inception to April 25, 2026. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality using the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research. Synthesized findings were assessed using the JBI ConQual approach. Results Six qualitative studies involving 113 registered nurses were included. Thirty-eight findings were extracted and aggregated into eight categories, which generated three synthesized findings: (1) GAI may enhance work efficiency and professional competence; (2) nurses encounter ethical, cultural, and operational challenges when using GAI; and (3) nurses require training, institutional support, and clear guidance for standardized GAI use while maintaining positive expectations for future applications. Conclusion The available qualitative evidence suggests that registered nurses perceive GAI as a potentially supportive tool for improving efficiency, assisting clinical and research decision-making, and promoting professional development. However, the current evidence base remains limited, and the findings should be interpreted as preliminary. Further research across diverse healthcare systems and cultural contexts is needed to clarify how GAI can be safely and responsibly integrated into nursing practice. Systematic review registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420261365306, Identifier CRD420261365306.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Jul 2026

A Meta-synthesis of nursing students’ experiences with generative artificial intelligence-assisted learning

Nursing students’ experiences with generative AI are shaped by both the opportunities and challenges associated with its use in learning, highlighting the need for nursing educators to strengthen students’ AI literacy, critical thinking, and ethical awareness.

Shanshan Du, Sha Wang, Feng-ming Yan et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

The Patient's Voice in Advanced Practice Nursing: A Qualitative Systematic Review of Lived Experiences.

Understanding patients' lived experiences of advanced practice nursing can help nurses and healthcare organizations strengthen patient-centred care and highlight the importance of protecting time for listening, supporting clear and individualized communication, building trustful partnerships, encouraging patient participation, and recognizing APNs' role in coordinating care across complex healthcare systems.

Qin Hu, Wei-Yan Tan, Shanshan Liu et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

Clinical Nurse Specialists' Journey From Novice to Expert—A Systematic Mixed‐Method Review

This review shows that developing CNS expertise from novice to expert requires education, clinical experience, and continuous professional support, while further research on support strategies and competencies is needed.

Sanna Marika Imeläinen, T. Kvist, Meagan Wright et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Nurses' and Nursing Students' Experiences With Generative Artificial Intelligence in Educational and Clinical Settings: A Scoping Review

Thematic analysis revealed that various factors underpinning their attitudinal, normative, and control beliefs are critical determinants of nurses' and students' overall experiences with GenAI and their intentions to use GenAI technologies.

Ming Wei Jeffrey Woo, Adrian Heng Tsai Tan · 0 citations
Review Aug 2026

Mapping the evidence on generative artificial intelligence for higher-order thinking skills in nursing students: A scoping review.

The dual role of GenAI in HOTS development indicates that nursing education should integrate GenAI judiciously, and efforts should focus on improving the quality of human-AI collaboration, with particular attention to humanistic care, thereby helping students positively reshape their professional perceptions.

Yan Ning, Shanshan Sun, Yingkun Lu et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

Roles and Outcomes of Advanced Practice Nurses in Thailand: A Systematic Review

Background and Objectives: Advanced practice nurses (APNs) play an increasingly important role in improving healthcare quality and outcomes. This systematic review synthesized evidence on APN roles and healthcare outcomes in Thailand. Methods: The review protocol was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD420261331793). Four databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, and Thai Journals Online) were searched from inception to January 2026. Two independent reviewers performed study selection, data extraction, and methodological quality assessment using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT, 2018) for mixed-methods studies and the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal checklists for quasi-experimental, analytical cross-sectional, and qualitative studies. A narrative synthesis was undertaken because of methodological heterogeneity. Results: Twenty studies were included, comprising eight quasi-experimental studies, six cross-sectional studies, four mixed-methods studies, one retrospective study, and one qualitative descriptive study. APNs performed diverse roles, including direct clinical care, care coordination, consultation, patient education, mentoring, and implementation of evidence-based practice. APN-led models of care were associated with favorable clinical outcomes, enhanced self-care and quality of life, increased patient and caregiver satisfaction, and reduced hospital length of stay and healthcare costs. Conclusions: The available evidence suggests that APN-led models of care may be associated with favorable patient, family, and health system outcomes in Thailand. However, these findings should be interpreted cautiously because the evidence was derived predominantly from non-randomized and observational studies, and the independent effects of APN practice could not always be isolated.

Phatcharaphon Whaikid, Noppawan Piaseu · 0 citations