Skip to content

Gen-PINNs: Generative Adversarial Physics Informed Neural Networks for solving partial differential equations

Oct 2026 · 0 citations
Computer Science Physics

Abstract

Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) are a widely used data-free method for solving Partial Differential Equations (PDEs) using machine learning. With recent advances in Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), adversarial learning has shown strong capabilities for modeling complex data-driven problems; however, the use of GANs in deterministic physics-informed PDE solutions remains limited. In this work, we first identify limitations of standard PINNs for solving PDEs, including spectral bias, loss imbalance, and optimizer stagnation. We then propose Generative Adversarial Physics-Informed Neural Networks (Gen-PINNs), a unified deterministic residual-adversarial framework designed to improve data-free solutions of PDEs with sharp or shock-front behavior. The generator learns the underlying PDE solution using dynamically weighted physics-informed loss components, while separate discriminators evaluate complementary PDE residual features against ideal zero-residual states. The framework further develops and adapts several methodological components, including a Fourier representation for resolving high-frequency spatial content, an orthonormal spectral diagnostic for quantifying frequency-dependent solution errors, and a modified gradient-based dynamic weighting system for physics, initial-condition, boundary-condition, and adversarial loss objectives. Gen-PINNs is tested against standard PINNs on nonlinear and higher-order PDEs, including the Burgers, Allen-Cahn, and Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equations. The results demonstrate substantial improvements in accuracy and convergence across sharp-front, stiff, and higher-order PDE solutions, highlighting the potential of deterministic residual-adversarial learning as an effective approach for solving challenging nonlinear PDEs.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Conference Open access Jun 2018

Gibson Env: Real-World Perception for Embodied Agents

This paper investigates developing real-world perception for active agents, proposes Gibson Environment for this purpose, and showcases a set of perceptual tasks learned therein.

F. Xia, Amir Zamir, Zhi-Yang He et al. · 1,069 citations · ⚡112
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Diffusion models as plug-and-play priors

The possibility of inferring high-dimensional data inference in a model that consists of a prior and an auxiliary differentiable constraint given some additional information is considered, thereby allowing a range of potential applications in adapting models to new domains and tasks.

Alexandros Graikos, Esmeralda S. Whitammer, N. Jojic et al. · 316 citations · ⚡15

Trajectory Balance: Improved Credit Assignment in GFlowNets

It is proved that any global minimizer of the trajectory balance objective can define a policy that samples exactly from the target distribution, and empirically demonstrate the benefits of the trajectories balance objective for GFlowNet convergence, diversity of generated samples, and robustness to long action sequenc...

Esmeralda S. Whitammer, Moksh Jain, Emmanuel Bengio et al. · 302 citations · ⚡60

KTO: Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic Optimization

This work proposes a HALO that directly maximizes the utility of generations instead of maximizing the log-likelihood of preferences, and suggests that the best loss depends on the inductive biases most appropriate for a given setting, an oft-overlooked consideration.

Kawin Ethayarajh, Winnie Xu, Niklas Muennighoff et al. · 195 citations · ⚡28

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.