Skip to content
#natural language processing Conference Open access

The “10th Juror”: Open-Set Standpoint Screening for Bureaucratic Bias Detection

Oct 2026 · Proceedings of the 2026 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · pp. 12576-12594 · 0 citations · 46 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

MARS-Gov, a standpoint-aware multi-agent framework that combines legal retrieval, open-set target screening, specialized jurors, conservative routing, and rewrite verification is proposed, a standpoint-aware multi-agent framework that combines legal retrieval, open-set target screening, specialized jurors, conservative routing, and rewrite verification.

Abstract

Presupposing the boundaries of bias is itself a form of bias. We study closed-loop bias governance for Dutch government documents, where a system must detect biased language, ground decisions in legal and contextual evidence, rewrite problematic sentences when intervention is warranted, and verify that the rewrite mitigates harm without distorting meaning. Existing methods face three challenges: (i) discriminative classifiers capture surface regularities but lack normative grounding; (ii) zero-shot LLMs often adopt generic viewpoints and over-flag ambiguous administrative language; and (iii) fixed taxonomies inherit the Closed-World Assumption, missing emerging local targets. We propose MARS-Gov, a standpoint-aware multi-agent framework that combines legal retrieval, open-set target screening, specialized jurors, conservative routing, and rewrite verification. When screening finds an uncovered group, MARS-Gov instantiates a dynamic"10th juror"to deliberate outside the fixed panel. On DGDB, MARS-Gov sets a new SOTA with 0.880 F1, outperforming the strongest zero-shot LLM detector by 20.2 points (29.8% relative) and the best supervised Dutch encoder by 6.8 points, while reducing unnecessary interventions to 2.5%. Leave-One-Category-Out (LOCO) evaluation recovers held-out categories with 85.1% Correct@1 and 93.8% Correct@3.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Oct 2026

Multi-Test Nation Bias Benchmarking of LLMs with Explicit Unbiased Baselines

This work uses an expanded corpus of 722 official UN Security Council records to measure nation-level bias with five complementary tests, thereby extending prior approaches to cover a broader set of bias expression channels and proposing an action-based pseudo unbiased status derived from observable voting behavior to...

Jonghyeon Choi, Yeonjun Choi, Beakcheol Jang · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

A CaLLM Judge is a Better Judge: Mitigating Bias in LLM-as-a-judge

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as judges to predict which of two candidate answers a human evaluator would prefer, providing a scalable alternative when human evaluation is too costly. Unfortunately, LLM judgments can exhibit systematic biases. Prior work has documented position, verbosity or model...

Cesare Barbera, Luca Stradiotti, Lorenzo Cascioli et al. · 0 citations
#natural language process... Preprint Oct 2026

Two Uncertainties Are Not One: Disagreement versus Decision-Risk in Cheap Structured Content Moderation

Content moderation compresses a graded, contested human judgment into a binary act (leave up / take down) over billions of items, at a scale where running a frontier LLM on every post is uneconomical. A new class of frozen"System One"models returns typed, calibrated decisions instead of text at ~USD 0.000025 per call a...

Karan Yadav · 0 citations
#natural language process... Open access Sep 2026

Moral Entropy: Auditing Bias and Uncertainty in Moral Judgment

Moral Entropy is introduced, a Bayesian framework that keeps a full posterior over the true label and decomposes its entropy into aleatoric uncertainty (irreducible disagreement about the moral content) and epistemic uncertainty (from insufficient or noisy annotation) -- and lets any heuristic consensus rule be audited...

Maciej Skorski · 0 citations

PROSE: Preservation-Constrained Selective Editing for Guilty Bias in Legal Judgment Prediction

Legal judgment prediction models may retain a guilty verdict after a legally decisive condition has been altered such that the specified charge is no longer established. We study this guilty bias via selective repair over matched charge-established and charge-not-established cases, where the unsupported verdict should...

Yi-Meng Wang, Ze-Yu Tian, Xing-Yu Wang et al. · 0 citations
#software testing Book Open access Oct 2026

Closed-World Trustworthy Copilots for Legal and Regulatory Text

Applying large language models (LLMs) to regulated domains such as financial and legal compliance is fundamentally a software engineering problem: an answer produced from a model’s parameters is, at the surface, indistinguishable from one grounded in the authoritative source, yet only the latter can be audited. Prior s...

Monalisha Ojha, P. Mishra · 0 citations

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.