Skip to content
#reinforcement learning Review Open access

Intelligent Greenhouse Temperature Management: A Closed-Loop Perspective on Sensing, Modeling, Control, and Deployment

Oct 2026 · Agriculture · 0 citations
Greenhouse Technology and Climate Control

Abstract

Greenhouse cultivation plays an important role in food security, resource-use efficiency, and sustainable agricultural development. Temperature management is particularly critical because it directly affects crop growth, yield and quality, energy consumption, and environmental control. To clarify the technological pathways, application boundaries, and future directions of intelligent greenhouse temperature management, this review synthesizes recent studies from a closed-loop perspective. A structured narrative approach was adopted to organize the literature around an integrated framework linking multi-source sensing and data governance, predictive modeling, control strategies, system deployment, and feedback-based operation and maintenance. The review first examines the roles of sensors, Internet of Things (IoT) technologies, wireless sensor networks, and multi-source data fusion in reliable greenhouse state perception. It then compares mechanistic, machine-learning, deep-learning, hybrid and physics-guided models in terms of prediction capability, interpretability, generalization, uncertainty, and control compatibility. Control strategies ranging from rule-based and fuzzy control to model predictive control, reinforcement learning, and RL-MPC are further evaluated with respect to constraints, adaptability, energy efficiency, and operational safety. Finally, edge–cloud collaboration, digital twins, safety fallback, and model lifecycle management are discussed as key enablers for translating prediction and control methods into deployable closed-loop systems. Overall, recent advances indicate that high prediction accuracy alone is insufficient for practical greenhouse management; reliable sensing, trustworthy modeling, safe control, system integration, and long-term maintainability must be considered jointly. Future research should therefore move toward crop-oriented, energy-efficient, trustworthy, and practically deployable closed-loop systems for intelligent greenhouse temperature management.

Read PDF

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#machine learning Review Open access May 2016

Key Challenges in Software Startups Across Life Cycle Stages

It is found that what perceived as biggest challenges by software startups do vary across different life cycle stages, even though its significance decreases when the learning focuses of the startups move from problem to solution and their products mature.

Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Sohaib Shahid Bajwa et al. · 62 citations · ⚡6

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.