Oct 2026· Journal of Multidisciplinary Science MIKAILALSYS
Teacher Education and Leadership StudiesPersonality Traits and Psychology
Abstract
Although teacher personality has received considerable attention in educational and psychological research, integrated explanations of its development remain limited. This study examines teacher personality development through psychoanalytic, behaviorist, and humanistic perspectives to clarify their contributions to teacher character formation. A qualitative integrative literature review was conducted through the systematic identification, selection, and analysis of relevant scientific articles and theoretical books on personality psychology, teacher development, educational psychology, and teachers’ professional characteristics. The literature was analyzed thematically by identifying, categorizing, comparing, and synthesizing key concepts concerning the psychological mechanisms underlying teacher personality development. The synthesis identified three interconnected mechanisms: internal psychological processes, behavioral learning, and personal growth. The psychoanalytic perspective emphasizes self-awareness and emotional regulation; the behaviorist perspective explains behavioral formation through learning and environmental reinforcement; and the humanistic perspective highlights empathy, self-development, and personal growth. Together, these perspectives provide an integrated conceptual framework that characterizes teacher personality development as a dynamic process involving psychological awareness, behavioral adaptation, and continuous growth. The study concludes that teacher personality should be understood as a developmental process shaped by internal and external factors rather than solely as a set of fixed traits. This framework contributes to educational psychology and teacher personality scholarship and offers practical insights for teacher education programs seeking to develop teachers’ psychological, interpersonal, and professional capacities. Future research could empirically examine the framework across educational contexts.
The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.
Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· Information and Software Tec...· 394 citations· ⚡54
This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.
Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson· International Conference on...· 175 citations· ⚡19
This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.
Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 127 citations· ⚡15
It is found that roles of MVPs in startups were not fully aware by entrepreneurs, and entrepreneurs should consider a systematic approach to fully explore the value of MVP, as a multiple facet product (MFP).
Anh Nguyen-Duc, P. Abrahamsson· International Conference on...· 93 citations· ⚡9
It is found that what perceived as biggest challenges by software startups do vary across different life cycle stages, even though its significance decreases when the learning focuses of the startups move from problem to solution and their products mature.
Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Sohaib Shahid Bajwa et al.· International Conference on...· 62 citations· ⚡6
A comprehensive overview of how enhanced sampling methods are reshaping the field, with a particular focus on the data-driven construction of collective variables, is provided.
Kai Zhu, Enrico Trizio, Jintu Zhang et al.· Chemical Reviews· 58 citations
Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.