Skip to content

Teacher Personality Development: An Integrative Psychological Perspective on Psychoanalysis, Behaviorism, and Humanistic Theory

Oct 2026 · Journal of Multidisciplinary Science MIKAILALSYS
Teacher Education and Leadership Studies Personality Traits and Psychology

Abstract

Although teacher personality has received considerable attention in educational and psychological research, integrated explanations of its development remain limited. This study examines teacher personality development through psychoanalytic, behaviorist, and humanistic perspectives to clarify their contributions to teacher character formation. A qualitative integrative literature review was conducted through the systematic identification, selection, and analysis of relevant scientific articles and theoretical books on personality psychology, teacher development, educational psychology, and teachers’ professional characteristics. The literature was analyzed thematically by identifying, categorizing, comparing, and synthesizing key concepts concerning the psychological mechanisms underlying teacher personality development. The synthesis identified three interconnected mechanisms: internal psychological processes, behavioral learning, and personal growth. The psychoanalytic perspective emphasizes self-awareness and emotional regulation; the behaviorist perspective explains behavioral formation through learning and environmental reinforcement; and the humanistic perspective highlights empathy, self-development, and personal growth. Together, these perspectives provide an integrated conceptual framework that characterizes teacher personality development as a dynamic process involving psychological awareness, behavioral adaptation, and continuous growth. The study concludes that teacher personality should be understood as a developmental process shaped by internal and external factors rather than solely as a set of fixed traits. This framework contributes to educational psychology and teacher personality scholarship and offers practical insights for teacher education programs seeking to develop teachers’ psychological, interpersonal, and professional capacities. Future research could empirically examine the framework across educational contexts.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#machine learning Review Open access May 2016

Key Challenges in Software Startups Across Life Cycle Stages

It is found that what perceived as biggest challenges by software startups do vary across different life cycle stages, even though its significance decreases when the learning focuses of the startups move from problem to solution and their products mature.

Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Sohaib Shahid Bajwa et al. · 62 citations · ⚡6

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.