Skip to content

Reinforcement Failing guides the discovery of emergent physical dynamics in adaptive tumor therapy

Oct 2026 · npj Artificial Intelligence · 55 references
Mathematical Biology Tumor Growth

Abstract

Abstract Artificial intelligence is revolutionizing scientific discovery in medicine, with reinforcement learning (RL) emerging as a promising tool for optimizing therapeutic strategies. Yet applying RL to complex scenarios such as therapy dynamics in solid tumors is constrained by the challenge of constructing training environments that are both computationally efficient and mechanistically interpretable. Here, we introduce Reinforcement Failing, an AI-guided, human-in-the-loop discovery framework that shifts the focus from agent policy optimization to the refinement of the training environment itself. By combining multi-fidelity RL with group-relative performance evaluation across agent cohorts, Reinforcement Failing systematically reveals emergent mechanisms that first-principles models overlook. We apply this framework to adaptive therapy in solid tumors, which seeks to delay resistance-mediated treatment failure. In this setting, Reinforcement Failing uncovered a coupling between the mechanically driven collective motion of cells and spatially-heterogeneous proliferation that strongly influences therapy outcomes. We integrated these emergent physical mechanisms with existing domain knowledge into an augmented training environment, resulting in improved cross-environment therapeutic performance and exposure of potential pitfalls during translation. More broadly, these findings position Reinforcement Failing as a powerful artificial scientific discovery framework, capable of deciphering high-complexity processes at the interface of physics, machine learning, and medicine.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#machine learning Review Open access May 2016

Key Challenges in Software Startups Across Life Cycle Stages

It is found that what perceived as biggest challenges by software startups do vary across different life cycle stages, even though its significance decreases when the learning focuses of the startups move from problem to solution and their products mature.

Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Sohaib Shahid Bajwa et al. · 62 citations · ⚡6

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.