Skip to content

HGWO-RL: hybrid grey wolf optimization with Q-learning refinement for energy-aware multi-objective task scheduling in heterogeneous fog–cloud networks

Oct 2026 · Engineering Research Express · Vol 8 · 0 citations · 36 references
Physics

Abstract

Energy-aware task scheduling in fog–cloud IoT networks must balance monetary cost, deadlines and energy. We propose hybrid grey wolf optimizer-reinforcement learning (HGWO-RL), which combines a grey wolf optimizer (GWO) with a tabular Q-learning agent that selects move operators to refine the three elite solutions. The model includes release times, FIFO node queues, a utilization-dependent power model and the objective F = Ctotal + λEtotal, where λ is an energy price; the problem is proved NP-hard. Seven algorithms were compared under an equal budget of 3000 evaluations, 30 paired runs and 23 configurations. HGWO-RL achieved the lowest objective in 22 configurations; relative to Min-CCV it reduced the objective by up to 3.64% and energy by up to 18.1%, and improved deadline satisfaction. From random initialisation it outperformed GA, PSO, GWO and ACO by 35–94%. HGWO-RL obtained the best Friedman mean rank (1.04), and Holm-corrected Wilcoxon tests found it significantly better than every baseline, although the Nemenyi test did not separate it from PSO and GA. The ablation study shows that elite local refinement provides most of the gain; Q-learning operator selection adds a significant 15.6% improvement over random selection under cold start, but no significant improvement under warm start.

Read PDF

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#machine learning Review Open access May 2016

Key Challenges in Software Startups Across Life Cycle Stages

It is found that what perceived as biggest challenges by software startups do vary across different life cycle stages, even though its significance decreases when the learning focuses of the startups move from problem to solution and their products mature.

Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Sohaib Shahid Bajwa et al. · 62 citations · ⚡6

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.