Skip to content

Deep Adaptive Reinforcement Learning‐Based Energy Efficient Clustering and Resource Allocation Mechanism in Ultra‐Dense Network

Oct 2026 · International Journal of Communication Systems · 34 references
Advanced MIMO Systems Optimization

Abstract

ABSTRACT Due to the quick enhancement of the 5th Generation (5G) wireless communications, the user count is enhancing relatively. So, Ultra‐Dense Networks (UDNs) are becoming very significant for assisting various users and enhancing mission‐critical applications. To link numerous user systems and offer better data rates, the UDN is referred to as an effective innovation in 5G. It boosts the overall network functionality by enhancing the throughput of the system and managing the load balance of the system. But, the enhanced power utilization and the interference of the UDN because of the deeply installed Base Stations (BSs) are unavoidable. In order to tackle the interference and computation issues in the UDN, a clustering procedure is suggested. In the resource allocation process, the clustering procedure helps to tackle the computational issues by converting the entire cluster into sub‐clusters. But, these techniques face more issues in terms of users' Quality of Service (QoS), and they also lag in ensuring the system's transfer efficiency. Thus, to tackle these difficulties, new energy‐efficient clustering and resource allocation mechanisms for UDN have been introduced in this paper utilizing adaptive deep learning. First, an optimal clustering process is performed to choose the clusters optimally using Modified Hybrid Leader‐based Optimization (MHLO). Moreover, several multi‐objective functions are derived using MHLO and this process also supports managing the traffic load among the clusters. Subsequently, in order to enhance convergence and minimize computational complexity, resource allocation is performed in UDN. For this objective, Deep Adaptive Reinforcement Learning (DARL) is employed, where the network parameters are optimized by the MHLO algorithm. In the end, numerical and experimental research is carried out on the developed energy‐efficient clustering and routing model over diverse traditional algorithms and techniques. The developed framework MHLO‐DARL accomplished higher throughput by 3.4%, a success rate of 97%, and energy efficiency of 0.85%, which seems to be better than recent techniques like GAN‐DDQN, DDQN, STPD‐RL, and MDQN‐MAR. Hence, the validation outcomes showed that the suggested mechanism is more efficient in allocating the resources and executing clustering procedures in the complex environment without affecting communication in a network.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#machine learning Review Open access May 2016

Key Challenges in Software Startups Across Life Cycle Stages

It is found that what perceived as biggest challenges by software startups do vary across different life cycle stages, even though its significance decreases when the learning focuses of the startups move from problem to solution and their products mature.

Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Sohaib Shahid Bajwa et al. · 62 citations · ⚡6

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.