Skip to content

A fast risk assessment method for power balance under extreme weather conditions based on deep reinforcement learning with a coupled attention mechanism

Oct 2026 · PLoS ONE · Vol 21, pp. e0359101 - e0359101 · 0 citations · 43 references
Medicine

Abstract

Even if persistent stagnant weather does not directly damage power grid equipment, it may lead to prolonged insufficient output of renewable energy sources and further trigger power balance risks. This paper proposes a rapid risk assessment framework that comprehensively incorporates meteorological sensitivity models, time-varying component failure probabilities, a Denoising Variational Autoencoder (DVAE) for generating coupled wind-photovoltaic-temperature scenarios, and a Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient (DDPG) model embedded with the feature token attention mechanism.The 72-hour assessment task is formulated as an offline Markov Decision Process (MDP): the state space covers meteorological conditions, power sources, power grid topology, load profiles, and risk features of the previous time step; continuous actions are defined as risk indicator vectors; the reward function is designed to penalize deviations between model outputs and PSD-BPA benchmarks, temporal inconsistency, and violations of physical constraints.To distinguish the sequential reinforcement learning formulation from direct regression, a feedforward Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) is introduced as the non-reinforcement learning baseline. Four metrics, namely Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), coefficient of determination (R2), and the 95th percentile of absolute error (P95AE), are adopted to evaluate all models on an independent scenario-level test set.Verified on the planned power grid of Northeast China in 2025 as the test case, the proposed DDPG-Attention achieves MAE of 0.0310, RMSE of 0.0389, R2 of 0.954 and P95AE of 0.0760 on the independent test set. The average time consumption for a single risk assessment is approximately 0.12 seconds, yielding an acceleration ratio of multiple orders of magnitude compared with the traditional time-sequential Monte Carlo simulation based on PSD-BPA. This study provides an efficient and accurate novel technical paradigm for the rapid evaluation of power supply-demand imbalance risks in power systems under extreme weather conditions.

Read PDF

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#machine learning Review Open access May 2016

Key Challenges in Software Startups Across Life Cycle Stages

It is found that what perceived as biggest challenges by software startups do vary across different life cycle stages, even though its significance decreases when the learning focuses of the startups move from problem to solution and their products mature.

Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Sohaib Shahid Bajwa et al. · 62 citations · ⚡6

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.