This work presents the first results from an exploratory assessment of GenAI-aware threat modeling methods in a Small and Medium Enterprise (SME) setting and reports practitioners' perceptions of the usability and integration of these methods in SME development workflows, including their perceived effort and adoption challenges.
Abstract
Threat modeling remains a central task in secure software engineering, as it enables the identification of security issues from system architectures. As Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) becomes increasingly pervasive across software systems, traditional threat modeling methods (e.g., STRIDE) are insufficient to assess emerging GenAI-specific risks. In this work, we present the first results from an exploratory assessment of GenAI-aware threat modeling methods in a Small and Medium Enterprise (SME) setting. For this, we conducted a rapid literature review to select relevant techniques and systematically applied three shortlisted methods to an industrial case study involving a GenAI-augmented system. The results highlight differences in the threats identified by each technique and reveal limited support for certain GenAI-specific risk categories, particularly those related to software supply chains and human-centered security issues. We further report practitioners'perceptions of the usability and integration of these methods in SME development workflows, including their perceived effort and adoption challenges.
Empirical evidence is provided that generative AI can effectively support security requirements engineering when embedded within human-centered workflows and organizational governance structures, offering practical insights for adoption in regulated software development contexts.
F. Martins, Elaine Venson· SIGSOFT FSE Companion· 0 citations
This paper investigates a secure-by-design engineering process focusing on the initial architectural design and examines the role that AI-powered agents can play in supporting it, as well as the conditions required for their effective and reliable use.
C. Ponsard, Jean-François Daune· Proceedings of the 23rd Inte...· 0 citations
This work contributes an empirical, practitioner-driven analysis of LLM use across SOC roles and organizations and derives concrete design and integration requirements for human-centered, operationally safe LLM-assisted security operations.
Jonas Thurner, Nadine Jost, Stefan Albert Horstmann et al.· 0 citations
This paper organizes the area into a structured taxonomy along five axes: the de-tection capability targeted, the analysis paradigm employed, the agent archi-tecture, the degree of autonomy, and the evaluation methodology.
Andi Xia· Poster Volume 0008 The 2026...· 0 citations
A systematic evaluation framework for LLM-driven threat modelling tools to support tool selection, observing the general LLM-integration, governance risks, and allowing for comparison of tool output is introduced.
Josephine Bakka, A. Brandhøj, T. Bøgedal et al.· Proceedings of the 23rd Inte...· 0 citations
The goal of this study is to understand practitioners'decision making process and security considerations in selecting and integrating AI components through an exploratory semi-structured interview study, and distill the findings into actionable recommendations for AI adopters, model providers, and researchers.
Mahzabin Tamanna, Elizabeth Lin, Sparsha Gowda et al.· 0 citations