This work introduces agentic graph token reasoning, which recasts graph tokenization as part of the reasoning process itself and pushes LLM-based graph analysis from static graph-token encoders towards a graph-native agent paradigm.
Abstract
Graphs model relational data throughout science and industry, from citation networks to product co-purchase graphs. Because the nodes of many such graphs carry rich text, a growing line of work applies large language models (LLMs) to graph analysis. The most graph-native of these methods use graph tokens: a graph encoder compresses a graph view, such as a node, its k-hop neighbourhood, or a cluster, into a short block of continuous tokens that jointly encodes node attributes and topology and is read directly by the model. Existing methods, however, use graph tokens in a static single-shot manner: they encode one predefined graph view before the model has even seen the target and never revise it, leaving the model's step-by-step reasoning ability unused. We introduce agentic graph token reasoning, which recasts graph tokenization as part of the reasoning process itself. At each step, the model chooses which graph view to encode and at what granularity; a graph encoder is invoked on demand to materialise the corresponding graph tokens; and the resulting block is spliced into the running context. The model thus reasons step by step in the graph token space, and the tokens it reads are trajectory-dependent. We realise this with a three-stage training pipeline: (i) self-supervised tasks that teach the model to read heterogeneous graph tokens, (ii) a token-robust trajectory stage with a graph-token consistency regulariser, and (iii) preference optimisation that rewards trajectories in which the graph-token evidence and the node-text evidence agree. Across evaluations spanning seven graph domains, our models outperform a broad set of baselines by a large margin and transfer zero-shot to unseen domains without any per-target fine-tuning. More broadly, this work pushes LLM-based graph analysis from static graph-token encoders towards a graph-native agent paradigm.
GRA is presented, a Graph Reasoning Agent that explores hybrid knowledge graphs, whose nodes are either textual concepts or relational tables, with seven generic tools, discovering everything domain-specific at run time.
M. Dragić, Ruben Ifrah, Alexandre Rio· 0 citations
This work proposes AgentGFM, in which all node agents follow a shared end-to-end trainable policy rather than using independent models, and describes this capability as information-flow control, which is inspired by recent advances in agent technology.
Jingbo Cui, Jitao Zhao, Di Jin et al.· 0 citations
This work proposes method that unifies textual reasoning and graph message passing within a masked diffusion language model, a language model with bidirectional attention and generative decoding that outperforms graph neural networks, graph transformers, and LLM-based baselines on all three TAG benchmarks across two tasks.
This paper develops a comprehensive benchmark construction framework and constructs three diverse benchmark datasets and proposes a unified evaluation framework that assesses both linguistic quality and factual consistency, providing a comprehensive approach to evaluating generated summaries for content fidelity and accuracy.
Xiaoxuan Gou, Weiguo Zheng, Hanqing Guo et al.· Proceedings of the 32nd ACM...· 0 citations
GABench is introduced, a comprehensive benchmark for agentic graph analysis that covers four graph analysis task categories: graph retrieval, graph theory, graph machine learning, and graph open-ended question answering and provides practical insights into the development and evaluation of LLM agents for graph analysis.
Jiarui Tan, Zhongjian Zhang, Yabo Guo et al.· 1 citation
RAGU, an open-source modular GraphRAG engine, addresses extraction from consolidation by separating extraction from consolidation: entities and relations pass through two-stage typed extraction, DBSCAN-backed deduplication, LLM summarization, and Leiden community detection.
Mikhail Komarov, Ivan Bondarenko, Stanislav Shtuka et al.· 0 citations