Skip to content
Review

Incidence and Influencing Factors of Pain Crisis in Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Oct 2026 · Journal of Nursing Scholarship · Vol 58 6, pp. e70145 · 0 citations · 34 references
Medicine

TL;DR

The incidence of pain crisis in cancer patients is relatively high and is influenced by bone metastasis, chemoradiotherapy, social support, age, and emotional states, which underscores the need for integrating routine psychological assessment and tailored pain management strategies into clinical oncology nursing practice.

Abstract

Aims

To systematically evaluate the incidence and influencing factors of pain crisis in cancer patients, providing evidence for targeted preventive interventions and optimized clinical nursing strategies.

Design

A systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines. DATA SOURCES PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CINAHL, Embase, SinoMed, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP were searched from inception to February 2026. REVIEW

Methods

Literature screening, quality assessment, and data extraction were performed independently by two researchers. Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic, and effect sizes were expressed as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results

Seven studies involving 1865 cancer patients were included. The pooled incidence of pain crisis was 37%. Significant influencing factors included bone metastasis (OR = 3.91), radiotherapy and chemotherapy (OR = 3.23), social support (OR = 0.88), and age (OR = 0.92). Anxiety (mild OR = 8.00, moderate OR = 9.15, severe OR = 10.99) and depression (mild OR = 6.54, moderate OR = 6.46) were also significant predictors.

Conclusions

The incidence of pain crisis in cancer patients is relatively high and is influenced by bone metastasis, chemoradiotherapy, social support, age, and emotional states. Nurses should dynamically assess risk, identify factors, and implement individualized interventions to prevent pain crisis and improve quality of life. IMPACT This meta-analysis provides robust evidence for identifying high-risk cancer patients for pain crisis. The findings underscore the need for integrating routine psychological assessment and tailored pain management strategies into clinical oncology nursing practice to reduce the occurrence of pain crises and enhance patient well-being. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION Not applicable.

View source

Similar papers

Review Open access Sep 2026

Efficacy and safety of early mobilization in patients with ARDS: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective To evaluate the effect of early mobilization in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Methods Computerized searches were conducted in PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang Data, CBM, and VIP databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on early mobilizati...

Ze-Yan Wu, Xiao-Yue Wei, Yan Sun et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Efficacy of psychological interventions versus standard care for cancer pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background Cancer-related pain is frequently accompanied by psychological distress, which may worsen symptom burden and impair quality of life. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of psychological interventions versus standard care for pain intensity, depressive symptoms, and anxiety...

Yue Hu, Hai-Xiao Liu, Ling-Yun Wang et al. · 0 citations
Review Sep 2026

Multimodal rehabilitation interventions for psychological outcomes in adults after esophageal cancer surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Multimodal rehabilitation may have potential value in supporting psychological recovery after esophageal cancer surgery, however, the magnitude and clinical importance of the effects remain uncertain because of low-certainty evidence, heterogeneity, and possible publication bias.

Tong Wu, Qiu-Ling Qin, Lei Zhong et al. · 0 citations
Review Sep 2026

Risk factors for pressure ulcer development among adults undergoing surgery: a systematic review.

This systematic review identified several risk factors for PU development across the included studies during the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative surgical period, and the development of a core outcome set of risk factor variables for inclusion in future studies may enhance homogeneity and support risk st...

Sadie Badrie, P. Avsar, Sherly George et al. · 1 citation

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.